I am a former smoker. When I did smoke, I simply did not take my cigarettes into the park. If you have a beef with those who are simply abiding by the rules of the park and those who are using the designated smoking locations so that they don't pollute the rest of the Disney air don't go around the area.
First off, I'm glad you quit smoking. Since I'm not familiar with the smoking sections at WDW, I can't speak to that topic specifically --only to smoking sections in general. But I remember in the 90's when places around here were starting to be required by law to have non-smoking sections, such as in restaurants. They would always have the designated smoking sections along the path to the restrooms. Some places were even so obnoxious as to have the designated smoking section at the front door. Non-smokers had to go to the back. So it's not always as simple as avoiding the offending area. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't. And even when one can avoid the area, the smoke can travel well outside the area, and no one knows where the smoke cloud begins.
I kinda have to laugh at the comments. some people truly have no idea about addiction. It is funny to read their comments like they are the holier than thou and they have never done anything wrong.
I suppose there will always be some who have no idea about addiction. I saw it with my dad though. My father was pretty much a chain smoker. Rarely would he go more than 20 minutes between cigarettes. He tried to stop smoking a few times, or at least cut back, and failed every time. Ultimately cigarettes contributed to the decline of his health. As many years as he smoked (for well over 50), I'm amazed that he didn't have more issues sooner than he did.
The last 5 years of his life were smoke-free. He had a stroke and was FORCED to give up smoking while he remained in the hospital for a month. He was given the patch instead. It was a very rough transition, but a successful one. At least today, we have nicotine patches to get over this particular addiction. And at this point, I
want to say that if someone really wanted to get free from smoking, that's it's as easy as getting the patch.
But I know it's not that simple. I know that with my dad, the only reason the patch worked is that he had no other alternatives. If he had any control over the situation, he would have lit one up during that time for sure.
As for me, I've developed asthma from my day's habit. My asthma is nowhere as bad as it used to be, but anytime I unexpectedly walk into a nicotine cloud, my lungs stop taking in air. And that's not by my personal choice. Whenever I know ahead of time that I have to walk through a nicotine smoke cloud (ie. when it's unavoidable), I have to take a deep breath, hold it, walk through the offending area, then gasp for breath on the other side. I don't always make it through on one breath though, and inhale a large volume of smoke and end up having a very uncomfortable shortness of breath for a few hours with a borderline asthma attack from the residual smoke.
So for me, when it comes to others smoking, it's not simply a matter of a foul odor in a small area, it's a matter of being able to breathe. Smokers can talk about their rights and all, but when they claim that their right to smoke supersedes my right to breathe, I'd say that
they are being holier-than-thou.
With the comments about all of the cancer causing elements...why not ban the sun because it causes skin cancer?? LOL I am sure someone will respond to this but hey, this is my entertainment purposes so flame away!!
The sun is necessary for life on earth. What value do cigarettes have? Oh right, they make a select few rich and bring in some "sin tax" revenue.