Patient shot at hospital....

What could have been different?!!!
Geez. Why do psychiatric patients sit in waiting rooms for hours on end waiting for a bed and then when they are getting worse the nurses call in the cops? Why not an on call psychiatrist? Why isn't someone called right away to administer some sort of preliminary care...even if a psychiatric bed isn't available.

How about triaging this patient like this is an emergency like you would any other patient having an emergency.

They don't leave someone having a heart attack sitting for 3 days in the ER untreated awaiting a bed.

We need more psych beds in the US. Ever since we switched to a community model of care and closed all the hospitals it's been a problem. It was a great plan but there was no follow through on the funding for the community part of it.

It is downright terrifying to think what to do or where to go for families with mental health emergencies.

There are very few psychiatric emergency rooms in the US.
 
According to the article, the staff called security because he refused to fasten his gown, and it is hospital protocol to call security when a patient does not cooperate. But they didn't say he was violent or had an outburst with them, just wanted to be naked. I'm not sure who was harmed by allowing him to be in an unfastened gown in his hospital room. So, having him properly admitted, see a pysch, or just not having inflexible protocol would be a good start.

From a follow up article:http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/19/us/alan-pean-hospital-guns-mental-health.html?_r=0
After the incident, federal health officials conducted an emergency investigation and faulted the hospital for the shooting, saying that St. Joseph had created “immediate jeopardy to the health and safety of its patients” and ordered that it restrict use of weapons and provide more training in dealing with mentally ill patients.

I don't think it's enough to hire an off duty cop for this type of work, as this hospital did. Security in hospitals that carry guns need special training for mental health patients. And I'd also question teh need for guns in hospitals at all given taht some of the largest and most dangerous areas of the country say they operate just fine without them.

I'll also add, Mr. Pean was CHARGED with 2 FELONIES for this "assault" on officers in the hospital. The charges were dropped, but not until his family spent $100,000 on legal bills trying to fight the charges. $100,000.
 
It seems like the staff was adequately informed of the patient's mental health issues, and they called security anyway - and the cops walked into a situation they were uninformed about and ill-equipped to deal with.

Though it's hard to say what the patient was telling the staff. It doesn't matter what his history is, if he's saying he's in his right mind, until he's a threat to himself or others my experience is that they're not going to admit him or restrain him involuntarily, and they're going to treat him like any other patient.
 


According to the article, the staff called security because he refused to fasten his gown, and it is hospital protocol to call security when a patient does not cooperate. But they didn't say he was violent or had an outburst with them, just wanted to be naked. I'm not sure who was harmed by allowing him to be in an unfastened gown in his hospital room. So, having him properly admitted, see a pysch, or just not having inflexible protocol would be a good start.

From a follow up article:http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/19/us/alan-pean-hospital-guns-mental-health.html?_r=0
After the incident, federal health officials conducted an emergency investigation and faulted the hospital for the shooting, saying that St. Joseph had created “immediate jeopardy to the health and safety of its patients” and ordered that it restrict use of weapons and provide more training in dealing with mentally ill patients.

I don't think it's enough to hire an off duty cop for this type of work, as this hospital did. Security in hospitals that carry guns need special training for mental health patients. And I'd also question teh need for guns in hospitals at all given taht some of the largest and most dangerous areas of the country say they operate just fine without them.

I'll also add, Mr. Pean was CHARGED with 2 FELONIES for this "assault" on officers in the hospital. The charges were dropped, but not until his family spent $100,000 on legal bills trying to fight the charges. $100,000.

He obviously wasn't in his right mind and shouldn't have been charged.
 
It seems like the staff was adequately informed of the patient's mental health issues, and they called security anyway - and the cops walked into a situation they were uninformed about and ill-equipped to deal with.

Though it's hard to say what the patient was telling the staff. It doesn't matter what his history is, if he's saying he's in his right mind, until he's a threat to himself or others my experience is that they're not going to admit him or restrain him involuntarily, and they're going to treat him like any other patient.

He was not saying he was in his right mind. He went to the hospital because he knew he was having a bipolar episode and he wanted help. He entered the emergency room yelling 'I'm Manic" The VERY FIRST NOTES made about him when he was admitted included a note about his Bipolar history. His father and brother called the emergency room to warn him he was coming, and of his history. Despite all that, he was placed for observation in the surgical ward.

They did, however, prescribe him a muscle relaxer which can exacerbate psychotic symptoms.
 
But if they were treating him like any other patient...is it protocal to call security on grandma if she strips because she has dementia? Would this have happened if a small child got naked and insisted on not wearing a gown?
 


He was not saying he was in his right mind. He went to the hospital because he knew he was having a bipolar episode and he wanted help. He entered the emergency room yelling 'I'm Manic" The VERY FIRST NOTES made about him when he was admitted included a note about his Bipolar history. His father and brother called the emergency room to warn him he was coming, and of his history. Despite all that, he was placed for observation in the surgical ward.

They did, however, prescribe him a muscle relaxer which can exacerbate psychotic symptoms.
I missed that part - that's what I get for skimming. I certainly wasn't blaming the patient. I don't understand why the staff did what they did.
 
It seems like the staff was adequately informed of the patient's mental health issues, and they called security anyway - and the cops walked into a situation they were uninformed about and ill-equipped to deal with.

Though it's hard to say what the patient was telling the staff. It doesn't matter what his history is, if he's saying he's in his right mind, until he's a threat to himself or others my experience is that they're not going to admit him or restrain him involuntarily, and they're going to treat him like any other patient.

Why would they restrain him? How about discussing with him what he needs. If he came in to the hospital voluntarily -- even if he was manic -- something was bothering him enough to bring him in.
 
Why would they restrain him? How about discussing with him what he needs. If he came in to the hospital voluntarily -- even if he was manic -- something was bothering him enough to bring him in.
I didn't say they should? I actually am saying they should have treated him differently than a patient who was in his right mind and for some reason they didn't, I don't know why - I don't get it. It's not the patient's fault and it's not security's fault. The hospital handled it badly.
 
It's a very convoluted system. I can only speak for NJ, but the way the system works is a mess. I will try to explain, but 1st I would like to say that I have been a nurse for more than 20 years and I have never worked in a hospital with armed security guards. I can try to explain the system (which doesn't work, BTW)

If a patient presents to the ER with a psychiatric complaint that is anything other than being suicidal/homicidal they wait like the rest of the patients that do not have life or limb threatening illnesses and injuries. A suicidal patient is a Level II in the triage system (a Level I is a patient actively being resuscitated) A level II is the same priority given a patient with chest pain, BTW.

The problem starts when a psychiatric patient presents at a hospital that does not have psychiatry (and not all do) in NJ if a patient goes to a hospital that does not offer psychiatric treatment they are evaluated in the ER and then a call must be placed to the county agency that evaluates crisis patients to have a crises screener come to the hospital and evaluate that patient. Unfortunately, those patients are not considered a priority since they are considered "safe" because they are in a hospital setting and are being monitored on a 1:1 basis. It may be 24 hours or more until they are able to get the crisis screener out. On a positive note, many non psychiatric ERs are going to a telepsych system, which is, essentially, a SKYPE type eval.

Once the patient is evaluated it can take days or even a week to find an appropriate bed. (There aren't enough beds) If they are insured then the right type of bed (locked, unlocked, geriatric, adolescent, pediatric) has to be found in a facility that accepts their insurance. f they are uninsured or not privately insured then the same thing happens except with medicare/caid/indigent beds. The added problem here, is that now we have to deal with "counties." So if a bed is found, that bed must 1st be offered to a resident of the county in which the bed is located, even if the out of county resident/patient has been waiting longer.

The problem with security comes in if the patient is being kept on a non-psychiatric unit, whether they are waiting for a bed, or being treated for a different illness altogether. Medical units and ERs do not have the staff or the physical set up to appropriately treat a psychiatric patient in crisis. Especially a patient who may be in crisis and unmedicated because they are awaiting an eval or transfer to an appropriate facility. Also, the crisis screener does nt want the patient medicated because they need to be able to evaluate them "at baseline." The staff is encouraged to call security as an acting out patient (psychiatric or otherwise) is a danger to the staff. Think of it this way, if you are in a community ER with 5 nurses who all have 4 patients, some critically ill, 2 doctors to see all those patients, and 2 techs to do all the tech/aide stuff, there just isn't the ability for 1/2 of those people to leave what they are doing to attend to the patient in question.

Some emergency departments have PES (Psychiatric Emergency Services) which are small units within the ER designated to specifically treat and evaluate patients in crisis. They are physically set up and staffed appropriately with psychiatrists and social workers. The public is generally, not aware of this, though, and EMS often disregards this.

Also, regarding the above patient. Unfortunately, sometimes patients do get out of control and become dangerous and do require physical restraint. I don't know that this was the case with this patient, but I am just saying it is sometimes necessary.

Also remember not all staff members have experience or specialized training in dealing with psych patients. If you are a nurse with psych experience or an psych tech and a patient wanted to be naked you would probably just say, "fine, you have to stay in your room with the door closed, and assure that staff assigned to this patient is same sex." However, this is a medical unit situation. It is possible that the patient had a room mate, that there wasn't male staff available, or that the staff didn't know how to handle this situation and staff on medical units are instructed to call security if they have uncooperative patients or visitors.

Not that he deserved to be shot. I, honestly, cannot imagine armed security guards in a hospital.
 
Last edited:
Also, the crisis screener does nt want the patient medicated because they need to be able to evaluate them "at baseline." The staff is encouraged to call security as an acting out patient

I know you didn't personally create this plan -- and I have heard of it before -- but it is ridiculous. I have personal experience of a hospital putting a small child in a concrete seclusion room while providing zero treatment for a period of 48 hours because the doctor wanted to wait and observe (even though the child already had a dx and was previously medicated). Mental illness is not just "acting out" which implies purely behavior. It can have painful symptoms. I don't think there is any other area of medicine where doctors would intentionally have a patient suffer while they watch and wait and then punish the patient for their symptoms. No one would have a diabetic patient wait for insulin so the hospital could get a baseline and standby and watch them have a seizure. Or give breathing tests to an asthmatic until they passed out on the floor, while waiting for needed steroids.

Why, then, is it okay to deny a patient with mental illness medication to get a "baseline" and then when they display symptoms (because they are unmedicated) security is called?

It is interesting to hear how other places are handling this. We have moved several times. I have a family member that worked in mental health and it seemed most places were moving away from restraint and seclusion. But some states just can't seem to let go.
 
I know you didn't personally create this plan -- and I have heard of it before -- but it is ridiculous. I have personal experience of a hospital putting a small child in a concrete seclusion room while providing zero treatment for a period of 48 hours because the doctor wanted to wait and observe (even though the child already had a dx and was previously medicated). Mental illness is not just "acting out" which implies purely behavior. It can have painful symptoms. I don't think there is any other area of medicine where doctors would intentionally have a patient suffer while they watch and wait and then punish the patient for their symptoms. No one would have a diabetic patient wait for insulin so the hospital could get a baseline and standby and watch them have a seizure. Or give breathing tests to an asthmatic until they passed out on the floor, while waiting for needed steroids.

Why, then, is it okay to deny a patient with mental illness medication to get a "baseline" and then when they display symptoms (because they are unmedicated) security is called?

It is interesting to hear how other places are handling this. We have moved several times. I have a family member that worked in mental health and it seemed most places were moving away from restraint and seclusion. But some states just can't seem to let go.


I agree with you. The system doesn't work and I work within it. Bear in mind I only work with adults, but the only reason I can see where waiting to treat someone who was in crisis would be if they were under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

The system as it is is unfair to the patients. No other type of illness is handled this way. For example: If a patient comes into an ER having a stroke, and that hospital doesn't offer neurology, the patient is stabilized and transferred to an appropriate hospital ASAP. Within, probably, 2 hours, ASAP. No one says the patient has to wait for a neurologist to come out, evaluate the patient, diagnose a stroke, and then leaves the hospital staff to argue with several different facilities to take the patient based on their insurance and/or address.

It delays care and leads to longer hospitalizations. I have had situations where my patients have sat for days in ERs, psychotic and inappropriately medicated waiting for transfer.

FTR, moving away from restraint is not just a state thing, or it shouldn't be. Restraint/seclusion should always be the last resort and only used when all other methods have failed and then only if the patient is in danger of harming themselves or someone else. I would like to say we never have to use physical restraint, but, sadly it is, sometimes, necessary, but the laws surrounding physical restraint/seclusion are very, very strict, and from the little bit of your story I am hearing I think they were violated in your case. With adults, someone placed in restraint/seclusion must be evaluated by a psychiatrist, face to face, within 1 hour and then every 4 hours after. I think, it is more frequently with children. In 20+ years I have only seen 1 patient restrained or secluded for more than 4 hours.

I work outpatient now. We don't use seclusion at all and if we have to restrain someone it is only because of behavior in the extreme and a stop-gap measure until EMS arrives.

On the subject of crisis trained police officers. Some departments do have them. We have one with whom our clients are very familiar. He makes himself known in the clinic, he stops by, he chats with the patients, they know him and trust him. Our patients, when needed, would rather go to the crisis center with him in the squad car than in the ambulance with EMS. He's a good guy and has been very helpful to us.
 
From the article:

"In interviews with the Medicare investigators and notations in medical records, the nurses who cared for Mr. Pean describe a man who had flashes of lucidity, but was increasingly restless and bizarre.

He pulled out the IV in his arm. He thought it was 1989. He could not remember the car crash or why he was in a hospital.
But even in the throes of his illness, he was polite. When a nurse told him to return to his room after he repeatedly emerged naked into the hall, he complied, she told investigators, with a “Yes ma’am, righty-o, O.K. ma’am.”


Police described his behavior like the "Tazmanian Devil": “It was like a big whirlwind,” he went on. “Everything was fair game. Objects, chairs, eating trays, everything was being thrown.” Additionally, he hit an officer in the head, causing a laceration.

So, even according to this article, there were obvious signs that this patient's behavior was escalating, and the protocol for escalating behavior, was activated, as it should've been - the reasons for which are outlined in the article below.

Having a ranting, confused, potentially violent, naked person in the hallways of a hospital is not something you can have - the reasons for which were explained by a pp. It is a safety issue for not only staff, but patients and visitors. I have had patients like that go into other patients rooms and scare people, or come after staff, etc. It is not unusual for them to become violent. If another patient was attacked by this man people would be asking why nobody stopped him. How would everyone feel if it was their wife or mother or son in the next bed and this person was out in the hallway repeatedly, naked and escalating? IME (30 yrs of this) others feel unsafe, fearful and very concerned in that situation.

Having armed police officers in hospitals is an interesting concept. I have no experience with that. Where I work he would've been - at that point - led back to his room by unarmed security and restrained if necessary.

No question violence in hospitals and against healthcare workers is on the rise.
___________________________________________________________________________________________

From Medscape:

Step Away From That Nurse! Violence in Healthcare
Editor's Note: It was only earlier this month that another attack on nurses was reported, this time at a hospital in Minnesota, when it appears that a patient suddenly became violent and attacked nurses with a metal bar taken from his hospital bed. The frightening video shows how the nurses were attacked as they sat in the nurses' station in the middle of the night.

Brutal Attacks on Nurses
A nurse approached a patient's bedside to remove an intravenous (IV) catheter in preparation for discharge from the hospital. He lunged at her, hitting her with an IV pole and knocking her to the ground, stomping on her head, and beating her repeatedly until she became unconscious. The nurse suffered head trauma and multiple fractures to her face. She survived the attack but required neurosurgery and was in critical condition for some time. The patient, who was not known to be dangerous, apparently became angry when told he was being discharged from the hospital.

Fortunately, such extreme incidents of violence are not everyday occurrences in healthcare. Still, they do happen, as illustrated by the following headline-making incidents:

At a psychiatric hospital in Maine, a patient attacked a nurse with a chair, injuring her face and head. In an earlier incident in the same unit, another angry patient beat a nurse in the head and stabbed her with a pen.

A corrections facility nurse in Michigan was checking on an inmate whom she thought was having a seizure, when he jumped up and attacked her.

At an ambulatory surgery center in Texas, a patient's son accused staff of trying to kill his mother, and he fatally stabbed a nurse who tried to protect other patients from harm.

At a rehabilitation facility in Oklahoma, a man became angry when nurses removed his father's urinary catheter, attacking a nurse with a wrench, pulling out some of her hair, and forcing her into a medication room.

In California, two incidents took place on the same day in different nearby hospitals. A visitor bypassed a weapons screening station and purportedly stabbed a nurse 22 times. In the second incident, a visitor grabbed a nurse and stabbed her in the ear with a pencil.

These events show that attacks on nurses can be sudden, serious, and life-threatening. They take place in a broad range of settings and involve patients, family members, and visitors who become angry for seemingly minor reasons or for no apparent reason at all. Violence against nurses is more frequent in, but not limited to, the emergency department (ED) or psychiatric units. It can happen in any healthcare setting, at any time. The unpredictable nature of workplace violence in healthcare is what makes it so difficult to prevent.

And the violence is not just physical. Emotional, sexual, and verbal abuse are not only more common, but are much more likely to be unreported. Nurses who are threatened with physical violence, but unharmed, do not always report the incident to their supervisors. Thus, firm figures on the frequency of workplace violence in healthcare are elusive.

Reading about these incidents of violence is a little scary. After all, no nurse goes to work expecting to be physically assaulted. Fortunately, the problem of workplace violence has not gone unnoticed by healthcare researchers, and new data are expanding our understanding of the threat to nurses.

A disheartening trend evident in the healthcare literature is that violence against nurses appears to be a growing problem globally.In the past 2 years alone, articles have been published in the professional literature on violence against nurses in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland,Sweden, Slovenia, Greece, Turkey, Cyprus, Pakistan, Iran, Jordan, Egypt,Nigeria, sub-Saharan Africa, Japan, and China. Continue Reading

Page 2 of 6
Harassment to Homicide
If you have been a victim of workplace violence, you know what it is and what it feels like. Workplace violence is any physical assault, threatening behavior, or verbal abuse directed at those who are at work or on duty. Violence includes overt and covert behaviors ranging in aggressiveness from verbal harassment to homicide.

Workplace violence can have both physical and psychological effects on the victim.Although the workplace violence "umbrella" also includes worker-to-worker (lateral or horizontal) violence, this article focuses on violence perpetrated by patients, family members, visitors, or other strangers in the healthcare setting.

When Dan Hartley, EdD, workplace violence prevention coordinator at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), is speaking to nursing groups, he wants to find out how many nurses in the audience have experienced workplace violence. "I've learned to say, 'Raise your hand if you have never experienced workplace violence,'" says Hartley. "It's much easier to count the hands because so few of them go up."

What Do the Numbers Say?
Although no one disputes the fact that violence occurs in healthcare, we are still hampered by a dearth of firm statistics about the prevalence of workplace violence in healthcare settings. Data are collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) only on episodes of nonfatal violence that result in days lost from work—in other words, episodes that are reported and cause sufficient injury for the nurse to take time off from work.

However, surveys of nurses about their experiences with workplace violence suggest that, as a rule, only the most serious incidents are reported. Many nurses neglect to report workplace violence if they haven't been physically harmed, if they "excuse" the perpetrator's behavior for some reason, or if they believe that it is unlikely to be repeated (because the patient or visitor is gone from the facility, for example, or the nurse is not scheduled to work the following day).

Bearing in mind that they severely underestimate the prevalence of workplace violence involving nurses, the few available statistics can do no more than hint at the scope of the problem, but they do suggest that violence is increasing rather than decreasing.

BLS keeps statistics on the number of nonfatal workplace injuries that required days off from work. In 2012, a total of 19,360 episodes of violence or other injuries inflicted by persons or animals were reported in healthcare and social assistance, almost equally divided between acts that were intentional and those that were considered unintentional or intent unknown. This equates to a rate of 15.1 incidents per 10,000 full-time workers, and it represented a 6% increase in violence against healthcare and social assistance workers. When broken down by healthcare setting, 5910 incidents occurred in hospitals (15.6 per 10,000), 8990 in nursing or residential care facilities (37.1 per 10,000), and 1790 (3.7 per 10,000) in ambulatory care centers and offices. Considering reports by provider type, in 2012, a total of 2160 episodes of workplace violence against registered nurses and 780 against licensed practical/vocational nurses were reported.

Most likely, these data underrepresent true rates of nonfatal workplace violence. We know from survey data of nurses that workplace violence is common. A recent survey of 764 primarily white, female nurses employed by a large, multihospital urban/community hospital system asked nurses how often they experienced episodes of physical or verbal violence, and what they believed to be the causes of these incidents. The survey response rate was 15.2%. During the past year, 76% experienced violence (verbal abuse by patients, 54.2%; physical abuse by patients, 29.9%; verbal abuse by visitors, 32.9%; and physical abuse by visitors, 3.5%), such as shouting or yelling, swearing or cursing, grabbing, scratching, or kicking. Emergency nurses (12.1%) experienced a significantly greater number of incidents (P < .001). The perpetrators were primarily white male patients, aged 26-35 years, who were confused or influenced by alcohol or drugs.

Do Nurses Report Workplace Violence?
Nurses were also asked whether they reported these incidents of violence; reasons cited for not reporting included not sustaining physical injury (49.5%), inconvenience (26.1%), and the perception that violence comes with the job (19.6%). Other prominent reasons included being unclear about reporting policies, not wanting to draw attention to oneself, and fear of retaliation or reprisals. Other evidence confirms that many nurses take a fatalistic view of reporting workplace violence. They believe that reporting it is a waste of time, and nothing will be done about it anyway.

Hartley finds another reason that some nurses don't report workplace violence. "Some nurses don't understand what constitutes workplace violence. A patient might strike out at a nurse while he or she is giving a med, but that happens all the time. Or nurses say that they only report violent behavior if they have to go the ED." Hartley tells of a nurse who worked in a nursing home who had an "aha moment" at a workplace violence seminar. "I never thought of being hit, kicked, or spit on by patients as violence, until I realized one day that it was the same patients doing it over and over again. We weren't reporting it, so no one pinpointed the problem and nothing was ever done."

Workplace violence can, and has, happened in any area of healthcare. Although it is most frequent in three areas—the ED, mental health settings, and geriatric care—no healthcare setting is immune. Violence toward nurses has happened in labor and delivery, pediatrics, and ambulatory care. It happens in patients' rooms, waiting rooms, and even in patients' homes. Workplace violence affects all healthcare workers, but nurses are the most likely to be assaulted on the job.Continue Reading

Page 3 of 6
Healthcare Settings: High-Risk Workplaces
Like the nurse who has gotten used to patients striking out at her, nurses are often heard to say that violent acts by patients and visitors are "just part of the job." Has violence become so prevalent in healthcare that it must now be accepted as "going with the territory?"

"We tell nurses that violence isn't part of your job," says Hartley, "but violence prevention should be. The risk factors for violence are more common in healthcare settings."

NIOSH divides the risk factors for violence into three categories: clinical, environmental, and organizational. Clinical risk factors are those that relate to the patient, family member, visitor, or other individual, and include such characteristics as being under the influence of drugs or alcohol, having a history of violence, or being in the criminal justice system. Sometimes, a reaction to a healthcare provider who is perceived as being authoritarian or who used excessive force in the course of care can prompt anger. Some medical and psychiatric diagnoses are risk factors for violence, although most people with mental illness are not violent.

Environmental risk factors for violence are features of the layout, design, or amenities of the setting that might provoke frustration or anger, such as confusing signage, a lack of parking, or prolonged waiting. The environment can also elevate risk by providing such opportunities for undetected violence as unmonitored stairwells, insufficient lighting, or furniture and other items that could thrown or used as weapons. A lack of security systems, alarms, or "panic buttons" to call for help can restrict a staff member's ability to respond appropriately to a sudden threat.

Organizational risk factors include inadequate attention to the risk for violence in the workplace, a lack of staff training to prevent and manage violence, inadequate security and preparedness, and inadequate staffing.Continue Reading

Page 4 of 6
Can Healthcare Violence Be Predicted?
It would be unrealistic to suggest that violence can ever be completely eradicated from the healthcare environment however many zero-tolerance policies are implemented. When people are sick or injured, emotions run high. People are stressed, anxious, and unhappy. A more productive approach is to identify the behavioral cues that might foretell violent behavior, and the situations most likely to precipitate violence, in line with the philosophy that "forewarned is forearmed."

Picking up on the behavioral cues for violence has obvious benefits for the individuals in the line of fire, and an increased awareness about the catalysts for violence can help healthcare facilities bolster their security and response mechanisms. Electronic health records and data entry have made this type of analysis possible, but the benefits will be realized only if nurses and others are encouraged to make reports for every incident of workplace violence, regardless of whether physical injury occurs or the perceived intent of the action.

A recent study assessed the situational factors that seemed to most frequently precede violent behavior on the part of patients toward nursing staff. Using data from a centralized reporting system, all incidents (n = 214) during a single year (2011) at an urban hospital were analyzed. These incidents were reported by nurses (39.8%), security staff (15.9%), and nurse assistants (14.4%). Incidents of violence were found to be linked to specific patient characteristics and behaviors (cognitive impairment, pain or discomfort, demanding to leave), patient care (use of needles, use of restraints, physical transfer of patients), or situational factors (transitions in care, intervening to protect patients or staff, and redirecting patients).

Another study supports the fact that psychiatric and geriatric settings are prone to violence against nurses. A survey of 284 nurses working in locked psychiatric units demonstrated a rate of verbal aggression of 0.6 incident per nurse per week, and 0.19 incident per nurse per week for physical aggression. Episodes of violence were significantly more common on the evening shift (compared with the day shift), and having more patients with personality disorders was associated with higher rates of verbal and physical aggression.

An observational study in an acute care geriatric ward targeted the behavioral cues that might serve as warning signs for episodes of violence among elderly patients. Pacing around the bed universally preceded episodes of violent behavior, and all patients who became violent had previously demonstrated shoving behavior.

Just as important as the number and features of reported incidents, however, is how nurses feel at work. Do they feel safe, or are they frequently concerned about personal safety? Do they experience perceived threats, even if these don't materialize into violence? A study in a pediatric ED found that 26% of nurses were concerned for their safety at least weekly, and that the primary causes for their anxiety were patient or visitor agitation (with violence potential) and weapons in the ED. Most nurses believed that having a greater presence of security personnel or local police would increase their feelings of safety at work.

A new tool assesses perceptions of personal safety of nurses. Burchill designed and pilot-tested a survey instrument, the Personal Workplace Safety Instrument for Emergency Nurses (PWSI EN), which was found to have high content validity for identifying the factors that make nurses feel safe or unsafe at work.Continue Reading

Page 5 of 6
A Free Training Course in Workplace Violence
What prevents the risk for workplace violence from becoming a reality is often the steps taken by healthcare settings and staff to prevent, prepare for, and respond to violence in the workplace. A key element of this preparation is training in workplace violence geared toward nurses and other healthcare providers who are most likely to be victims of such violence—education that would seem to be mandatory for nurses who work in high-risk settings. "But when we spoke to nurses at healthcare conferences, many would tell us that they didn't have access to violence training in their work settings," said Hartley.

It was imperative to address this gap, and provide the tools and techniques that nurses need to prevent and manage workplace violence. NIOSH collaborated with Vida Health Communications and other experts in healthcare violence prevention to develop an online course called Workplace Violence Prevention for Nurses that awards free continuing education credits (2.6 contact hours) upon completion of the course's 13 modules. Course content was derived from experts in the field of workplace violence and from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's guidelines for the prevention of workplace violence in healthcare.

The course content is applicable for any healthcare professional or student who desires an introduction to workplace violence prevention strategies. For nurses who don't have time to complete the course in one sitting, the course applies "resume where you left off" technology.

Strengths of the course are hearing from nurses who have experienced violence in the workplace, and video case studies involving violence in healthcare. Video case study scenarios include a psychiatric patient in the ED, an angry husband on the postpartum unit, a death threat in home healthcare, a cognitively impaired patient in a long-term care facility, and a bed-bound patient making inappropriate sexual advances. The case studies and personal stories will resonate with nurses who have found themselves in similar situations, and perhaps wondered whether they could have been handled differently. The vignettes inform viewers about the appropriate steps to take during and after incidents of violence.

Using the crisis continuum as a model to describe how an individual progresses from normal stress and anxiety to a loss of control, the course delineates intervention strategies, including verbal and nonverbal responses that can be used to try and defuse tension and prevent the situation from escalating to violence. Nurses will learn about the dynamics of power and control, and how these influence behavior not only in the aggressor, but in the nurse as well.Continue Reading

Page 6 of 6
Is There an End to Workplace Violence?
Social and healthcare trends suggest that violence could continue to plague healthcare settings in the foreseeable future. Our hospitals have become places for the sickest of the sick, intensifying anxiety and tension on the part of friends and family members. Violence from the street spills over into urgent care facilities and trauma centers, and no one is turned away.

ED crowding has not eased, so wait times continue to frustrate people seeking care. The burgeoning elderly population is bringing with it an ever-expanding number of patients with dementia, and in many regions, access to mental health care is insufficient. Although violence is not part of the job, dealing with potentially violent people is still very real in healthcare.

Legislative solutions to workplace violence are being considered or have already passed in many states. Some of these laws mandate establishment of workplace violence prevention programs in healthcare facilities, and others increase penalties for those convicted of assaults on healthcare providers. However, many laws still pertain only to specific settings, such as the ED. For example, Texas recently made it a third-degree felony to assault an ED nurse, but it is still only a misdemeanor to assault a nurse elsewhere in a Texas hospital. Except in the ED, it is a felony to assault a nurse in only a handful of states. Clearly, we have more work to do.

To find out the laws in your state, visit the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA).The ENA also has extensive workplace violence resources for nurses.
 
From the article:

"In interviews with the Medicare investigators and notations in medical records, the nurses who cared for Mr. Pean describe a man who had flashes of lucidity, but was increasingly restless and bizarre.

He pulled out the IV in his arm. He thought it was 1989. He could not remember the car crash or why he was in a hospital.
But even in the throes of his illness, he was polite. When a nurse told him to return to his room after he repeatedly emerged naked into the hall, he complied, she told investigators, with a “Yes ma’am, righty-o, O.K. ma’am.”


Police described his behavior like the "Tazmanian Devil": “It was like a big whirlwind,” he went on. “Everything was fair game. Objects, chairs, eating trays, everything was being thrown.” Additionally, he hit an officer in the head, causing a laceration.

So, even according to this article, there were obvious signs that this patient's behavior was escalating, and the protocol for escalating behavior, was activated, as it should've been - the reasons for which are outlined in the article below.

Having a ranting, confused, potentially violent, naked person in the hallways of a hospital is not something you can have - the reasons for which were explained by a pp. It is a safety issue for not only staff, but patients and visitors. I have had patients like that go into other patients rooms and scare people, or come after staff, etc. It is not unusual for them to become violent. If another patient was attacked by this man people would be asking why nobody stopped him. How would everyone feel if it was their wife or mother or son in the next bed and this person was out in the hallway repeatedly, naked and escalating? IME (30 yrs of this) others feel unsafe, fearful and very concerned in that .

Bizarre? That's a medical term used in their report?

I wouldn't care a bit if there was a naked guy in the hall. They frequently bring people into the ER in various states of undress for various reasons. What exactly is so dangerous about this case of nudity that it justifies police intervention? The throwing and escalating behaviors are only described by the police AFTER police intervention.

You say he was "naked and escalating"...does restraint or police presence usually have a calming effect on patients?
 
^ Yes, bizarre is an acceptable term to describe behavior.

You would care if you were in a bed, helpless and afraid, seeing someone yelling and threatening in the hallway. I can guarantee it. Part of the staff's job would be to protect YOU.


The throwing and escalating behaviors are only described by the police AFTER police intervention.
"Increasingly restless and bizarre", along with pulling out an IV and other behaviors, is how the nurses described his behavior. That means he was a safety risk, he could not be left alone, and further intervention was warranted - by hospital policy. I have little doubt staff were trying to de-escalate the situation before they implemented the security policy, just by the description given. I'm sure there are many more details that were not disclosed in the article.

You say he was "naked and escalating"...does restraint or police presence usually have a calming effect on patients?
Restraint (or security presence) is not meant to have a calming effect - that ship has sailed at that point. It is solely, then, for safety.

Curious if you have any background in patient care?
 
Last edited:
Bizarre? That's a medical term used in their report?

I wouldn't care a bit if there was a naked guy in the hall. They frequently bring people into the ER in various states of undress for various reasons. What exactly is so dangerous about this case of nudity that it justifies police intervention? The throwing and escalating behaviors are only described by the police AFTER police intervention.

You say he was "naked and escalating"...does restraint or police presence usually have a calming effect on patients?

"Bizarre" is a term frequently used to describe patient's behavior. In this case it is appropriate. "Bizarre" isn't used exclusively on psych patient, either. Head injuries, stroke patients, patients under the influence. My husband is double boarded in neurology and emergency medicine, "bizarre" is a frequently used term.

We need to be honest, here. You can't have a grown man wandering around butt-naked. That isn't safe for him or anyone else. Even on a psychiatric unit a patient would not be allowed to be naked in a public area. (and, trust me, this happens more than you want to know) While it may not bother you, there are many, many people it would. This was a medical unit. There we old ladies, little kids, a grown man cannot just wander around naked.

I'm sure that this incident wasn't handled appropriately. How could it have been if the man ended up shot? But, unfortunately, there are times when patients do need to be restrained. It is a sad, but true fact. From the perspective of a nurse, managing a psychotic patient on a medical unit is much, much different than managing one on a behavioral health unit. It is a different physical set up. In BH you can remove other patients from the area easily to protect them. Nurses are not generally needed at the bedside of patients. Furniture is not able to be moved, or it is difficult to move. There aren't monitors and IV poles and pumps and cords.
 
Curious if you have any background in patient care?


No. I have a background in being a patient ...and a family member of a patient.

But, carry on...there was no way around shooting the "mentally ill" guy. Once he got naked, of couse, the police had to be involved. They did the right thing. We can all rest easier now that they got this bad naked guy before some poor old lady saw his bizzare nakedness.:sad2:
 
No. I have a background in being a patient ...and a family member of a patient.

But, carry on...there was no way around shooting the "mentally ill" guy. Once he got naked, of couse, the police had to be involved. They did the right thing. We can all rest easier now that they got this bad naked guy before some poor old lady saw his bizzare nakedness.:sad2:

So you would have been totally okay with the guy who clocked me because I told him he had to go back into his 6 week old child's room and put on some clothes.

He did not like the fact that I tried to stop him from walking into another child's room (as he was servicing himself totally naked).

Bizarre behavior indeed. And yes the police had to be involved to get him under control and into jail.
 

GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE

Dreams Unlimited Travel is committed to providing you with the very best vacation planning experience possible. Our Vacation Planners are experts and will share their honest advice to help you have a magical vacation.

Let us help you with your next Disney Vacation!











facebook twitter
Top