maburke
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2002
I agree with a PP that the fundamental problem here was a lack of clear communication. I agree that the owner was being very accommodating to work with a waitlist, but why did the renter not know the terms of payment until after the reservation was partly made, partly paid, and waitlist came through? I (in either role) would have wanted to agree on the contract FIRST, then start the process of securing the reservation. These contracts might be difficult to enforce, but at least it's harder to have a miscommunication of the terms when it's all spelled out. Any renegotiation of the terms then would have happened before the owner put in much effort or risk, and they could have a agreed or not done business then.
By the way, OP, to answer some of your original questions, you are allowed to feel anything you want. But unfortunately, if you don't have an agreement at that point, the owner is allowed to take the action that they did. Not something I'd do, though; I agree with BestDadEver & I would have allowed the deal to continue on the original (verbal, at least?) terms. And I would never feel insulted that someone doesn't trust me -- the trust in this process needs to be earned.
By the way, OP, to answer some of your original questions, you are allowed to feel anything you want. But unfortunately, if you don't have an agreement at that point, the owner is allowed to take the action that they did. Not something I'd do, though; I agree with BestDadEver & I would have allowed the deal to continue on the original (verbal, at least?) terms. And I would never feel insulted that someone doesn't trust me -- the trust in this process needs to be earned.