ericafny
<font color=purple>OK, I am a real Harry Potter ge
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2005
The gun must be securely locked when left in the car.
I just don't understand WHY they passed this law....what is the PURPOSE of being able to "bring your gun to work but keep it in the car?"
I just don't get it!
I understand its the law. And I also understand there are plenty of responsible people who own guns who would not go 'postal' on a group of people. But what about those people that aren't stable and would use their gun if they had a bad commute in to work? I'm just sayin...
I understand its the law. And I also understand there are plenty of responsible people who own guns who would not go 'postal' on a group of people. But what about those people that aren't stable and would use their gun if they had a bad commute in to work? I'm just sayin...
"Why" doesn't matter. It is the law in FL.
I can speculate that some people carry a gun with them most of the time and rather than having to go home first before then going to work (or back home first at the end of their shift), they would like to simply keep them in a secure location that is convenient.
There sure are a lot of gun threads lately. This subject is always a big divider with strong arguments on both sides. Both sides have merit. A persons position on this issue is formed by there upbringing and there experiences with guns, which are of course all different to a certain degree. Reasonable gun laws make sense to reasonable people. A back ground check and firearms training is a reasonable requirement when applying for a handgun permit. Outlawing owning a gun, even in your own home, such as in Washington D.C. is not a reasonable law. Not to mention it did nothing to slow down gun crimes in D.C. . I'm a gun owner that thinks Disney should be allowed to control what happens on it's own private property. If they're the ones who will be sued for big dollars when someone is hurt with a gun on there property, they should have the right to make it a condition of employment that you not bring your gun on WDW property. If someone is hurt with your gun on Disney property, you the gun owner, not Disney should be held liable. It seems as if Disney is being forced to accept a huge liability risk by Florida passing this law. All that being said, the law is on the books and people have to accept it and obey it. I hope this one goes in Disney's favor.
Pretty long winded aren't I.
I just don't understand WHY they passed this law....what is the PURPOSE of being able to "bring your gun to work but keep it in the car?"
I just don't get it!
Originally Posted by Launchpad11B
There sure are a lot of gun threads lately. This subject is always a big divider with strong arguments on both sides. Both sides have merit. A persons position on this issue is formed by there upbringing and there experiences with guns, which are of course all different to a certain degree. Reasonable gun laws make sense to reasonable people. A back ground check and firearms training is a reasonable requirement when applying for a handgun permit. Outlawing owning a gun, even in your own home, such as in Washington D.C. is not a reasonable law. Not to mention it did nothing to slow down gun crimes in D.C. . I'm a gun owner that thinks Disney should be allowed to control what happens on it's own private property. If they're the ones who will be sued for big dollars when someone is hurt with a gun on there property, they should have the right to make it a condition of employment that you not bring your gun on WDW property. If someone is hurt with your gun on Disney property, you the gun owner, not Disney should be held liable. It seems as if Disney is being forced to accept a huge liability risk by Florida passing this law. All that being said, the law is on the books and people have to accept it and obey it. I hope this one goes in Disney's favor.
Reasonable gun laws make sense to reasonable people.
Hold on while I go cut and paste from the other 19 threads about this same thing.....
I feel people have a right to protect themselves.