Nancyg56
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2005
I get the decision on who should be bounced. My issue is that if CSR had 200 rooms, they should only accept 200 reservations. If they make the customer-unfriendly decision to overbook, and now there are 201 reservations for 200 rooms, they should immediately notify whoever is going to get walked so they can set up alternate arrangements then. Using your example above, what if you and I were family and were meeting at CSR to vacation together, to include sharing a rental car? Now half of our group is at another location. That stinks, all because the hotel can't plan. Perhaps the chains should ask third-parties to include some kind of disclaimer when you book through them. Perhaps "Please understand that when booking through Expedia, HotelXYZ has determined you are their lowest priority customer. As such, for profit purposes, you may be asked to leave the hotel immediately upon arrival. We'll let you know when you get there."
I originally quoted someone who was upset a 3rd party guest would normally be the one chosen to be bounced. I am not at all trying to justify any means used or not used to notify guests.