After reading the DMN article, I had to come back to comment on this part:
"Carmen Brown of Arlington was waiting in line as the victim was being secured in for the ride. She said she believed that the womans son was on the ride with her.
Brown said the woman had expressed concern to a park employee that she was not secured correctly in her seat.
He was basically nonchalant, Brown said. He was, like, As long as you heard it click, youre fine. Hers was the only one that went down once, and she didnt feel safe. But they let her still get on the ride.
She said the victim fell out of the ride as it made a sudden maneuver.
The lady basically tumbled over, she said. We heard her screaming. We were, like, Did she just fall?"
And the same woman is quoted on Daily Mail as saying: "'She goes up like this. Then when it drops to come down, that's when it (the safety bar) released and she just tumbled,' said Carmen Brown of Arlington. Brown said she was waiting in line to get on the ride when the accident happened"
One, again, haven't been on the Giant in years, but are we supposed to believe that the eyewitness, who was not even on the same train as the woman, was able to both hear what the woman said, AND later see her fall from the eyewitness' viewpoint at the station (which is covered and obscured), AND could hear her specifically screaming? The former yes, but combined with the rest, highly unlikely. She described how the woman fell, but then says, "We were like, did she just fall?" Huh? Not to mention, when you're waiting for and on roller coasters, all you hear is screaming. Logistically, it doesn't make sense. Another account of a person also waiting in the station to ride, didn't mention seeing or hearing anything until the woman's train arrived back in the station and her son (?) was yelling. Like I said before, maybe this lady actually heard/saw something, but it also sounds suspiciously like an awful lot of "filling in the blank" and embellishment, which puts her whole account into question.