Geoff_M
DIS Veteran, DVC Member, "Cum Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2000
- Messages
- 11,979
The problem is that even though there are a million possible names... there are millions more people and you can likely find someone that will take offense to pretty much any name you'd pick. So where do you draw the line? SOME, but not all Latinos, dislike the name. So how many "offended" people does it take to banish a word from our vocabulary?Agreed!
Italian American here. Call me PC, but if some team wanted to call themselves the Dagos...I'd be pissed off as well. If pork chop's offensive to a certain group, don't use it. As has been said, there are millions of names out there, why not use a different one? "Oh no! We simply can't live unless we call our mascot "PORK CHOP"!!!" As if! Nothing like a bunch of white folks sitting around online laughing about how a minority group is offended by an apparent lack of sensitivity.![]()
Also, context is everything. In your example "Dago" is a word that is solely used as an insult. Not so with "Pork Chop".... The mascot is a pig. It's the name of the mascot (who I find lacking of Latino features from the photo), not the team. No player would take to the field with the name "Pork Chop" in big lettering on their jersey. The team name is "Ironpigs", which is a reference to the region's iron industry heritage. But perhaps to be safe they should scrap the pig theme entirely as some Muslims and Jews might find it offensive.