BroganMc
It's not the age, it's the mileage
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
- Messages
- 2,991
Exactly. I also own weeks at Marriott Cypress harbor and Grand Vista which is located up by SeaWorld. One of the bugaboo's about that is that they have no transportation to anything parks. If they did, then I would have to pay for it in my annual dues. My annual dues are a lot less than they are for Disney because every guest has to bring their own vehicle.I can see how it could be argued both ways. But it isn't objectively wrong to call it a hotel expense, so I'd expect Disney to favor the approach that most benefits them. Especially since it's so clearly spelled out in the budget.
If a hotel or timeshare on I-Drive runs a shuttle to the Magic Kingdom, it's not a theme park expense. It's a hotel / timeshare expense. If a random Marriott offers an airport shuttle, that's not an airport expense. Same is true here, in that Disney transportation is a service provided to hotel & DVC guests. It's just a little more self-serving since Disney operates businesses at both ends.
Honestly it never occurred to me to object to subsidizing the bus transportation. One of the reasons we buy DVC is so that we can stay on property and use their transportation. That's the one thing we are guaranteed with our ownership. Discounts and park tickets are not guarantees.
Now if we could roll back time and have what they offered the original key West owners with free annual passes every year included in your membership, I would take that in a heartbeat. But that's not how market forces work. As soon as people were willing to buy without perks, Disney could justify dropping them. But notice how the market has chilled since they stopped offering sorcerer passes to DVC members? Nothing else encourages a business to offer benefits to its customers than a drop in sales.