Consider yourself lucky on the Brazilian thing.
Not luck, it's all about perception, and giving what you would like to get in return. There are lots of rude people at WDW in the oppressive summer heat, yet you don't see so many threads about them.
I live in a very multicultural community, and the second description most people would use in describing me would be 'white' or 'gringa' (after Canadian).
I don't see why describing someone's physical characteristics is a bad thing? If someone has a black, Japanese, or East Indian appearance, is slender or a little overweight, is European or Hispanic, then why should it be ignored when you are describing them? I guess I find 'ignoring' these characteristics almost as more offensive...as if there's something wrong with being these things and therefore they are something that be shouldn't discussed.
(Note - I am only referring to times when you are describing a person to someone else. I do agree that pointing out someone is 'black' or 'fat' or whatever when it's irrelevant to a story is a different matter entirely!)
Because usually it's not relevent. I discuss people in general, so unless I am looking for a trespasser into my school, then I need to give a physical description for safety reasons, but if I'm telling story about a guy, it's probably not relevant to the story as to what he looks like. This constantly happens with sexual orientation as well. One of my teaching colleauges feels the need to make it relevant to stories that someone is gay or lesbian, and it's never relevant, as that is a personal relationship between two people that I don't need to know anything about. It's to segregate people; there is no other reason for it.
Tiger



