npmommie
<font color=red>Channels George Michael in her car
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2007
- Messages
- 7,378
.where are YOUR links?
from Behavioral Neuroscience
http://www.apa.org/journals/releases/bne-feb08-swithers.pdf
.where are YOUR links?
from Behavioral Neuroscience
http://www.apa.org/journals/releases/bne-feb08-swithers.pdf
Thanks. Some nice light reading for Saturday afternoon...haha. Interesting though!
Real sugar is one of the unsafe options IMHO, even in smaller quantities. There is more research showing how unsafe sugar is (in how eating too much contributes to diabetes and obesity), than any alternative.
I meant to ask, has anyone tried Truvia? I think it's pretty new and is made from stevia.
And I will respectfully disagree with you. I gained weight while using aspartame instead of sugar. My BP went up as well as my cholesterol and triglycerides.I think the whole anti-artificial ingrendients movement has become a bit of a religion. It's ridiculous IMHO; perhaps even a bit of neo-Ludditism evoked by concern about how technological our society is becoming, and how some folks as a result are feeling like they're being left behind.
I'd be more concerned about putting saturated fat and trans-fatty acids into my body than artificial ingredients as a category.
I respect your decision but don't really see your experiment as anything more than a personal anecdote. I'm sure you know that there are many people who will relay precisely the opposite experience.
Regardless, the subject of this thread is, "What's the best artificial sweetener?" Discussions about the merits of natural sugar are essentially distractions and not on-topic to the OP's question.
There's always a best among options; either that or all are equally as good. Actually, more precisely, as my earlier messages pointed out, there may be aspects where one artificial sweetener is better than another, while for other aspects, it may be the other way around. In the spirit of the OP's question, I would like to hear what other people think about which artificial sweeteners are better for which aspects and which artificial sweeteners are better for other aspects.There is no best artificial sweetener.
There's always a best among options; either that or all are equally as good. Actually, more precisely, as my earlier messages pointed out, there may be aspects where one artificial sweetener is better than another, while for other aspects, it may be the other way around. In the spirit of the OP's question, I would like to hear what other people think about which artificial sweeteners are better for which aspects and which artificial sweeteners are better for other aspects.
Experiment? I have to say that is one of the most condescending posts I've read directed at myself here. I can tell you countless people who had a whole lot of physical issues while using aspartame. Some were digestive issues and others dealt with migrains. I can guarantee the cutting out of all artificial sweeteners was not an experiment but guided by doctors and other health professionals. Your comment about diabetics just floored me as well. Yes sugar can be bad but many have more issues with starches than just plain old table sugar.I respect your decision but don't really see your experiment as anything more than a personal anecdote. I'm sure you know that there are many people who will relay precisely the opposite experience.
Regardless, the subject of this thread is, "What's the best artificial sweetener?" Discussions about the merits of natural sugar are essentially distractions and not on-topic to the OP's question.
There is nothing more condescending than obstructing a discussion because you object to the very concept of the discussion taking place.I have to say that is one of the most condescending posts I've read directed at myself here.
Wow. I wasn't obstructing, just giving solid advise on how to lose weight. Just because you are a lover of chemicals like that doesn't mean you are right and have the best advise either when it comes to weight loss.There is nothing more condescending than obstructing a discussion because you object to the very concept of the discussion taking place.