Why would you pay less unless the 14 year old will actually DO less than the college kid... ?

crappy but true...That one makes a lot of sense. Is it worth 30% of the whole, though?... ability to drive herself to/from the job...
It could depend on what those would be. What did you have in mind, beyond what has been already mentioned?there are lots of factors
That one makes a lot of sense. Is it worth 30% of the whole, though?
It could depend on what those would be. What did you have in mind, beyond what has been already mentioned?
In every job I've ever had, I got paid less than more experienced workers doing the same job, until I gained more experience. That includes babysitting. I started out earning $2 per hour and the last job I had (5 or 6 years ago) paid $10 per hour.Yeah I understood that but it worries me to think about making economic trade-offs with regard to the safety of children like that. By the same token, perhaps another way of looking at it is that, with the college student, you're paying a premium for the reality that for certain things that go wrong the college student would handle them (taking the child to the hospital, for example), without even getting you involved until afterward, while the 14 year old would call you in to handle the situation.She will have experience with lots of different types of situations, is probably more able to handle less-than-ideal situations, and is more mature. She just has more know-how. I'll pay a "premium" (so to speak) for that kind of knowledge/expertise.
Yup it makes a lot of sense paying more for babysitting that includes late nights. Definitely. However, again, that's really a matter of you're paying for a different service, rather than paying based on age.But, I wouldn't do any late nights with a 14-year-old.
Ah so you're essentially exploiting the 14 year old's lack of opportunity. That's fair... age discrimination is only protected for 40 year olds and up!Also, the younger sitter does not have other opportunities available, she can't get a job at McDonalds, so I would think she'd be happy with a lesser rate of pay (because something is better than nothing).

Yeah I understood that but it worries me to think about making economic trade-offs with regard to the safety of children like that. By the same token, perhaps another way of looking at it is that, with the college student, you're paying a premium for the reality that for certain things that go wrong the college student would handle them (taking the child to the hospital, for example), without even getting you involved until afterward, while the 14 year old would call you in to handle the situation.
Yup it makes a lot of sense paying more for babysitting that includes late nights. Definitely. However, again, that's really a matter of you're paying for a different service, rather than paying based on age.
Ah so you're essentially exploiting the 14 year old's lack of opportunity. That's fair... age discrimination is only protected for 40 year olds and up!![]()

Around here, a college-aged sitter would get $10 per hour. We have a new 14-year-old sitter, does $7 per hour sound fair?


Wow, I hope my DD's babysitter doesn't see this!!
She is a college student, and sits for DD's two children, ages 5 and 1 and is paid $5.50 per hour. I can't imagine having to pay someone $10 or more an hour for babysitting, that is even more than minimum wage.![]()
I got paid $6.50 an hour 20 years ago for one 4 year old!