I hate to be the lone dissenter here, but honestly, it is your fence. He has no obligation to fix or help fix it, so I think he is being really nice to try. And unless he is a mind reader, I cannot imagine him even thinking he may have to contribute at all.
Would you ask his permission to take it down if you wanted it down? Probably not.
If it is that much trouble, remove the fence!
Maybe not an obligation, but since his dogs / kids are causing the damage (with an allowance for age) should he not be somewhat liable?
I remember my brother's neighbor put up a fence and then sent her three surrounding neighbors a letter requesting 1/2 of her cost. I thought that was totally out of line and apparantly her neighbors did too. She was not reimbursed. Who wants a fence on 1/3 of their property with no say so on what kind it is? and you most likely have gotten stuck with the "ugly" side. I don't think you should expect reimbursement for a tie in. You have a neighbor who, at least, is willing to take the time to help... he sounds like a keeper!
Mary
I don't expect any reimbursement for the original install, because my parents paid for it when they owned it, not I. I guess the idea is, that when you tie in to an existing fence, you are saving quite a bit of money (about 30% in this case), so you should offer something to the neighbor whose fence you are using as your third side. And, the "nice" side is on the outside, so they get to look at the nice side of our fence.
Is the fence 'on the line', or did your dad leave a little easement?
.........
Second - At this point, no matter the logistics of the fence, I think it is a huge, huge, stretch to expect a neighbor to pay to repair an older existing fence that was put up by you guys years ago. Your family put up the fence... I am assuming that it is on your property... And it is your responsibility.
If you don't want the neighbor to tie into your fence... allow his dogs and children to batter your fence, etc... etc... then instead of just repairing the fence... I would take this opportunity to move it in a little ways so that it is not 'on the line' and is clearly on YOUR property. If the neighbor wants to fence in his dogs and children, then he can put up that line of fence on his own property.
It is right on the property line - that is the law (or code?) in our area. You are not supposed to leave an easement between.
I never get it when people think a neighbor should pay for part of their fence. Maybe it is regional or something but I have really never heard of that, other than a few people on this board.
If I want a fence up, then I will choose the fence I want and put it around the edge of my property. Who is to say the neighbors even like that style of fence? Unless they were consulted before selecting a fence, I don't see why they should have to pay for it. I totally get them attaching onto your existing fence because it would be stupid to put up an additional wall where there is already one in place, even though it may seem like they are getting something free (which they are, but like I said, it would look weird to have a duplicate fence on the other side). Plus, even if they don't like the style of fence (say they wanted chain link), they are now pretty much stuck with picket as it would look silly to have two totally different styles in one yard.
Now if your neighbors were the sole cause of the fence deterioration then I would ask them to chip in for the repairs, but it doesn't sound like that is the case. I would just be happy he offered to help as it will take some time out of the job for your husband.
I'm not sure if this is something that is regional or not. Honestly, the first I ever heard of the notion of offering $$ to tie in was from my dad. He said it was 'common courtesy', and that in return for this courtesy he would have refused any money. But it bothered him that it was never offered. So in talking to other people, I've heard the same thing. But regional or not, it does seem to make sense.
Anyway, that really isn't the main point anymore. I didn't pay for the original fence, so its not my place to get indignant about something that should or shouldn't have happened 10 years ago.
My feeling is - this is HIS back fence now too (regardless of the fact that he didn't pay for it - he utilizes it as such). And that coupled with the fact that his dogs are a large factor in the damage makes me think that he ought to split the repair cost.
And its not about the $$. We can afford to do this repair. Its the principle.