PetePanMan
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2010
when turkey legs go, I go
#1: Crowds. We have gone so far three times in early January and found the lines mostly short and the crowds manageable. If there are no longer "off season" times when lines are 10-15 minutes for most things, I would not go anymore. Also, if they a) eliminate or reduce FastPasses (any more), or b) cut back on staffing so restaurants, etc. have long waits, that would also make a Disney vacation much less attractive for me.
#2: New Attractions. I'm pretty excited about new Avatar stuff, and (hopefully??) Star Wars... If they don't invest much in building new things/updating the parks, I'll lose interest in going. I do love the oldies-but-goodies, but that alone is not enough to draw me to WDW.
I guess we already crossed that line in the sand because we are local and switched from Disney AP's to Universal (although we still do water park AP's). I still love Disney and we really enjoyed the Halloween party this year, so we aren't completely out. And I keep reading these boards because I like to keep up with what Disney is doing and I keep thinking that we will switch back. But every year we do a couple of staycations and have been absolutely loved doing those at Universal. We love the pace at which Universal has been adding attractions, the staff at Universal are consistently wonderful to DS6 with autism, and we love our after 4p express passes that come with our premium AP's.
As others have mentioned, my line in the sand is if the elimination of the standby lines/reservation only thing becomes the norm. I don't know why it bothers me so much because the truth is we are not getting in a line for Toy Story that's 60 minutes long (my son just can't handle it). But there is something about the idea of Disney telling me that I can't wait in the line even if I wanted to (taking away that choice) that really turns me off.
You get 3 FP+ and a DAS so your son doesn't have to wait 60 minutes for TSM. Don't you know about the DAS?
Cost. Knowing that we could go to Europe or South America for (oftentimes) the same price irks me a bit. If it becomes too cost prohibitive it might be just a once in a great great while treat.
But in terms of service and decision-making, we were on the Fantasy in Hurricane Sandy and after a death-defying night Disney gave us only 25% off another cruise. It fell short of expectations, especially after a night sitting in the lobby thinking we might be in the water at any moment BECAUSE of their decision making. They wanted to push up the coast to get back to port. It was a decision based on their schedule and finances, not the safety and comfort of passengers.
And after all of that, GUESS WHAT WE DID LAST FEBRUARY. I'll never cruise in hurricane season again, but I gladly used my 25% off for a Western Caribbean Cruise and we had a great time. So maybe if I HAD actually died I wouldn't go back again? HA!
I don't really know if I could pinpoint anything specific. I'd first have to have something that I could compare WDW to for reference, but there really isn't anything like it. The closest option I have is Cedar Point, which really isn't comparable. Now, when I do Cedar Point I stay on site for free (my parents have a boat), the tickets and in-park costs are comparable to WDW's, and the thrill rides are spectacularly better than anything the mouse puts out. But the food sucks, shows are basically nonexistent, workers clearly would rather not be there, the park is dirty, my daughter and husband actually can't ride most of the rides, there's rarely fireworks, zero 'magic', you can't go there during the winter (and you wouldn't want to), and there's nothing offsite worth seeing (unless you're really into off track betting on harness racing). And ultimately, it's ONE park. So basically, in order to stop me going to WDW, Disney would have to offer a product that is inferior to what I get at Cedar Point.
I'm really impressed at people who say they can travel to Europe for less than a WDW vacation. My last Europe trip was more than twice what I usually pay to go to WDW. I'm by no means rich, but I consider WDW to be a cheaper option trip to be taken in between more expensive vacations. I mean, international airfares alone are killer! Perhaps it's having multiple kids that makes a difference.
Edited to say, I really do like Cedar Point! It's a different experience.
I really think tiered levels of fast passes and operating hours per hotel category would bother me. (and i think it will happen) . For example, 6 fp plus one hr early for deluxe only. Before you say Universal does it, I already know that and I think implementation at Disney would be much different
Good for you.
OK to answer your question for ME the line has been crossed with on site VS off site windows for FP+ Been going for over 30 years. We will always go to WDW, we just do it differently.
I think it's more than fair for those that are paying for onsite to get a longer FP window.