Understanding how to use my camera's lightmeter?

FirstTimertoDiz

<font color=teal>I love visiting NYC<br><font colo
Joined
Feb 19, 2002
Messages
1,002
I am getting there...I have been trying to focus (no pun intended) on learning one feature on my D50 a week. I must say after a few months of practicing, things are finally starting to click....ok, the pun is totally intended. ;)

So now I am a little embarassed to admit this, but I just for some reason cannot grasp the concept of the in-camera lightmeter. Can someone please help me unlock the mystery? What exactly is it, how do I read it, and what do I use it for?

Thanks for helping me out!
Lisa
 
The only time you will see the meter in the viewfinder is when you are in [M]anual mode.

The way it works is like this. You see a + then 2 dots, then a 0 over a line then 2 more dots then a -. With a "correct exposure" you will only see these. If the exposure is not "correct" then you will see additional lines in either direction next to the line below the 0. If all the lines are to the right of the 0 and go towards the "-" then you have to adjust your settings to allow more light. Do this by making the shutter slower and/or the aperture wider. Do the opposite if the lines go towards the "+".

You wont see the meter in any other mode becuase the camera will automatically adjust based on the settings that are already there.
 
I'll take a crack at the rest of your question, but I'm not a Nikon guy, so I may be spouting nonsense.

What is it?
Your light meter is what the camera uses to determine the exposure for a scene. It looks at the light reflecting off of your subject and determines whether your shutter speed, ISO, and aperture settings will work for a properly exposed picture.

How do I read it?
I think handicap18 has answered that. You might also see it in non-manual modes when you are using your camera's auto-bracketing or exposure compensation.

What do I use it for?
When shooting in manual exposure mode, you use it to to see when you have the exposure set "properly".

One thing to be wary about is that the meter can't tell the difference between a brightly lit black object and a poorly lit white object. It assumes that everything is grey. When it sees something white, it thinks that it is really brightly lit grey and it lowers your exposure to make the white look grey. When it sees black, it thinks that it is poorly lit grey and increases the exposure to make black look grey. You fix this by guesstimating how darker or lighter than grey your subject is and adjusting your exposure to match. With manual mode, you just directly adjust your exposure. With the auto-exposure modes (aperture priority, shutter priority, or auto), you dial in exposure compensation to correct.

You can also use your meter to check the different light levels in your scene. To do so, you would switch your camera to spot metering mode. You would then meter off of the brightest thing that you don't want blown out and the darkest thing you don't want lost in the shadows. That tells you the dynamic range in the scene. If you compare that to the range your camera is able to capture, you can tell whether or not you can properly expose the entire scene. If you can't, you either have to add light (flash or reflector), take light away (shade, gobo), or take a series of shots for use in an HDR composite. Alternatively, you could decide what's more important (the shadows or the highlights) and just set your exposure to capture those.

That's a whole lot of technical sounding mumbo jumbo. You really don't need to worry that much about it. While you are learning, I suggest that you let the camera handle the exposure (use aperture priority, shutter priority, or auto) and just check your histogram after you shoot. If it is hitting the left edge, use exposure compensation to boost your exposure. If it is hitting the right edge, use exposure compensation to lower your exposure. If it is hitting both, you have a scene that you camera can't handle. Take a few shots at different exposures and keep the one you like the most.

If you shoot in RAW, you can recover from missed exposures a little better. It's more trouble to work with, but it gets you out of more trouble.
 
Beautiful gallery you have there Mark!!
It looks like you and I have some similar interests...your theater room is very nice. AVS forum is another haunt of mine along with Dis and DPreview.
I will have to ask you another time abouth those Rocket speakers you have!
 

That's a whole lot of technical sounding mumbo jumbo. You really don't need to worry that much about it. While you are learning, I suggest that you let the camera handle the exposure (use aperture priority, shutter priority, or auto) and just check your histogram after you shoot. If it is hitting the left edge, use exposure compensation to boost your exposure. If it is hitting the right edge, use exposure compensation to lower your exposure. If it is hitting both, you have a scene that you camera can't handle. Take a few shots at different exposures and keep the one you like the most.

If you shoot in RAW, you can recover from missed exposures a little better. It's more trouble to work with, but it gets you out of more trouble.

Funny that you should suggest that....this past week I have been really working on using the histogram and exposure compensation! It's nice when things come together, and when that technical "mumbo jumbo" all of a sudden becomes an "AHA!" type of moment, kwim? I have many of those moments after reading posts like yours and handicap18's here on the Dis boards.....thanks to you both for helping someone out!

Lisa
PS- one of my goals in the future is to start shooting RAW. At this time, I have no software to support it, and I have not been able to take the time to research much about what is out there enough to get started.
 
PS- one of my goals in the future is to start shooting RAW. At this time, I have no software to support it, and I have not been able to take the time to research much about what is out there enough to get started.

Actually you do. I thought the same thing for a long time, but Picture Project (the software that came with the D50) will let you view NEF files (Nikon's version of RAW) and also convert them to JPEG's. Other than that you really can't do much with it. The few adjustment controls there are in PP are really not very good IMHO. But their converter from NEF to JPEG works like a charm. I've actually been using it a lot more lately. The only time I don't use it is when I know I have to adjust something in the image like white balance or exposure compensation. For that I use Lightroom (which has a 30 day free trial at adobe.com. You can also get a 30 day trial for Nikon's Capture NX, this is their full fleged RAW converter/post processing/editing software).

2 things I've found that have improved my images are shooting mostly in Aperture Priority and shooting RAW. It took me a good long while to move to RAW, but now that is all I shoot. Just my $0.02.
 
Actually you do. I thought the same thing for a long time, but Picture Project (the software that came with the D50) will let you view NEF files (Nikon's version of RAW) and also convert them to JPEG's. Other than that you really can't do much with it. The few adjustment controls there are in PP are really not very good IMHO. But their converter from NEF to JPEG works like a charm. I've actually been using it a lot more lately. The only time I don't use it is when I know I have to adjust something in the image like white balance or exposure compensation. For that I use Lightroom (which has a 30 day free trial at adobe.com. You can also get a 30 day trial for Nikon's Capture NX, this is their full fleged RAW converter/post processing/editing software).

2 things I've found that have improved my images are shooting mostly in Aperture Priority and shooting RAW. It took me a good long while to move to RAW, but now that is all I shoot. Just my $0.02.

Thank you for pointing that out- I actually did know that I could use Picture Project to convert; I actually have used it a few times. I just didn't think that there was any advantage to shoot RAW just to convert to jpg if I wanted to do any post-processing. Is there a reason to do that, or just shoot jpg in the first place?

I do need to check out lightroom- I have seen it mentioned here on this board quite a bit. How is the learning curve on using it? I have used Photoshop CS2 before- is it similar at all?

I should get looking into it- I have 3 weeks until my Disney trip, and I need to decide soon what I will be shooting while I am there.

Thanks!
Lisa
 














Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE







New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top