Do you still have the link to the article, would be curious as I have never really seen anything regarding stack height and foot strike specifically. I have read plenty of times that recommendations are often to train in different stack heights (am a big fan of the Doctors of Running site and they had this article a while back
https://www.doctorsofrunning.com/2025/01/the-monday-shakeout-who-does-best-in.html) Some of the training videos I have watched seem to follow that as well. They are fore/midfoot strikers (also with very effecient running form, heh) running in the high stack super shoes, but have other lower stack trainers they rotate in for other runs.
The other two things I see discussed a lot is drop and the softness/firmness of the foam itself. Obviously the lower the drop the more preferred for fore/midfoot. And then foam wise, the spongy/plush stuff is great for those slow/recovery runs, and then rotatiting in slightly firmer stuff for other runs. Of course you need to be spending money on all these shoes to rotate, but that is the fun part... right...
I don’t have the link, but it was on the homepage, down in the Here Are 5 Things We Tested And You Really Need to Buy! section.
I think there are probably a lot of variables involved, but for me, two stand out:
1. I’m very lightweight (not a flex - I’m also very short!) - more foam doesn’t give me any advantage that I can feel and almost always leaves me feeling inherently unstable for no good reason.
2. Loading a ton of foam into the heel and creating a rocker shape to encourage a foot to roll from heel to toe is literally the opposite of how my mechanics work - I land on the outside balls of my feet, my heels lever downward but rarely make any contact with the ground, and then roll off my toes to spring off. I have very strong feet, ankles, and calves as a lifelong dancer, and my running mechanics use that: when a shoe prevents my feet from flexing as they need to, the load ends up somewhere else and creates pain in knees, quads, hips, back, or even shoulders. And when stack heights are high, the shoes become inflexible - so it’s less that it’s tall, more that all that tallness requires a stiff, rockered motion that’s in opposition to my mechanics.
I’ve run in all sorts of different shoes and the ones that always work best for me are lower stack heights with plenty of flexibility. Even a 12mm drop Ghost back in the day was great - but it was only 17mm in the forefoot and had plenty of flexibility. Conversely, I tried one of Altra’s mega-stack shoes a while ago and though it was a 0mm drop that I’m used to, I couldn’t comfortably run in it because it was too stiff.
I used to buy into the idea of having multiple types of shoes to cycle through, but honestly? I’ve run and felt best sticking to one shoe models, or two that are very similar. I’m not breaking any records and just want to run comfortably in my later years, so I really hope I can continue to find the shoe traits that work for me going forward!