4greatboys
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2002
- Messages
- 26,816
And I don't consider that an upset. I thought Yul played a good game that was different from the good game that Ozzie played.
I don't either...but I was upset, lol.
And I don't consider that an upset. I thought Yul played a good game that was different from the good game that Ozzie played.
Really, hun?And your extreme adoration for Russell is clouding your. I expect to see a headline soon: "DIS fan stalks Survivor loser".![]()
I think he gave HIMSELF to much credit at the end.
I'd rather empty the canteens ;]
i agree with you. Russell controled most of the game. One part of the game he could not control is the jury. He thought since he played the best game, the jury would vote for him. Russell underestamated Natalie's religous bonds and her likablity.
Russell's name calling was done in his confessionals so did not factor in the game. However, he was right about how unbelievably poorly the majority of the other players were at Survivor.
I'll tell you the truth, I will give it to DisneyKing82, I got on the dis yesterday afternoon and he was going on about Russell's greatness then again hours later I popped in for a minute on the dis and he was still going on about Russell, I couldn't help but laugh out loud, never have I seen such faithfulness to one thread, I beleive he kept a continuous watch over the thread all day long.![]()
How so?
Are you suggesting that if people can vote more than once, that the result is an accurate representation of public sentiment?
Any statistics course would demonstrate the flaws in that argument.
They didn't vote for Natalie, they voted against Russell.
They didn't vote for Natalie, they voted against Russell.
It was for "The Player of the Season." Similar to an MVP award in sports. You win the MVP, you are recognized as the best.
Your judgment that it was for the most interesting, favorite, fun, is your opinion and is inaccurate.
Russell Hantz: Sole Survivor and Winner of Survivor Samoa
Although I was on Team Natalie, I totally agree.
I think the reason why Nat and Mick got so many questions during jury questioning is that they were deciding who of those two they were going to pick... I also think when Erik stated out loud he was going to vote Natalie, the rest of the jury went with Natalie because they knew she already had one vote in the bag over Mick so their chances of beating Russell were higher if they voted Natalie.