Spread the word, End the Word campaign

No, I actually like using the word per its definition.


re⋅tard  /rɪˈtɑrd, for 1–3, 5; ˈritɑrd for 4/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [ri-tahrd, for 1–3, 5; ree-tahrd for 4] Show IPA
–verb (used with object) 1. to make slow; delay the development or progress of (an action, process, etc.); hinder or impede.

–verb (used without object) 2. to be delayed.

–noun 3. a slowing down, diminution, or hindrance, as in a machine.
 
per its definition is obviously different than this campaign.

Its a campaign to stop calling people this name.
 

It's a cause near and dear to my heart. Everyone here knows I'm a dedicated Special Olympics coach. These guys are a huge part of my life and it pains me when I hear people throw that word around willy-nilly. I'm not talking about using the word as it was intended (ie, "this stuff retards the growth of mold"), but rather using it as an insult or a derogatory adjective.
 
Another case of the word police telling people how a word should make them feel. I don't allow any word to have the power to offend me so go ahead and use any you wish.
 
Another case of the word police telling people how a word should make them feel. I don't allow any word to have the power to offend me so go ahead and use any you wish.
How nice for you. Some people arent that strong and need someone to fight for them. Like my daughter.
 
How nice for you. Some people arent that strong and need someone to fight for them. Like my daughter.

All cases like this do (and I mean any word, not just this one) is project whatever meaning you have for a word onto others. I don't give words power and don't want the power others give them projected onto me.

It has nothing to do with even using the word, just being told how any word should make anyone else feel.

That is all and of course it is only my opinion.
 
Well, it is a legitimate word. In my business (disability) it is used all the time. It is part of the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) and, as another poster noted, it has other meanings too.

I do have a philosophical problem with people or groups trying to restrict speech, even if said speech is offensive to some.

Some people do use the word ‘retarded’ outside of its original meaning. However, that is the way language works. Over years or decades words meaning will often change from their original definition.

“Gay” is an excellent example. The meaning of gay has evolved so that it is now understood to mean a homosexual person; it is now part of the dictionary, alongside the older meaning.

Hence, while it may be distressing to you and yours to hear the word ‘retard’ or ‘retarded’ used outside of their original definition it is part of life and the evolution of language. Perhaps in future people will find another word to replace it, and the issue will go away.

Further, as I once wrote on this board (on a similar subject), for a person or group to try to force, whether by law or peer pressure, a person from using a word or form of speech is a form of domination. It is literally trying to control the thoughts and speech of another. If I say to you “You may not use the following words, on pain of legal or social penalty”, then I am trying to control your speech.

We see it in governments around the world. In some societies some words are expressly forbidden to be uttered. If you forbid enough words, you are making it more difficult for people to express their thoughts.

I recall a few years ago the city council of San Francisco considered an ordinance prohibiting the use of the word “pets” in referring to animals, like dogs and cats, owned by people. The proponents wanted ‘animal companions’ to be used in place of pets. The ordinance was defeated. Yet the proponents still claim to be offended by the use of that word and will ‘get in your face’ if you dare use it in front of them.

In my experience, people who claim to be offended by a word will - even if all agree to stop using that word – find something else to be offended about. You cannot satisfy people whom are easily offended.

Sometimes in these threads someone will say that people, adults and children, must someday face ‘the real world’ or learn about how ‘life really works’. Such with words. The words in question can certainly be used in an ugly way, but so can thousands of other words.
 
I don't use the words because I understand them to be offensive. My concern with this approach, though, is that it seems to be a never ending cycle. We used to call people, with no ill intent, crippled. Then we switched to handicapped. Then that became offensive, so we switched to disabled. Now people complain about that and suggest things like "special" or "differently abled."

The same thing has happened with terms used to denote some of African ancestry. I've even seen inane cases where someone has used the currently acceptable term "African American" to refer to people that aren't American at all because they've become accustomed to using that for anyone with that racial background.

My point is that few words are inherently bad. People start to associate negative connotations with them and insist that we move on to a different word. Then the process starts all over again. I'd be willing to bet good money that terms like "special", "African American", "Asian", and other replacements for formerly offensive terms will be seen as offensive 50 years from now. I have no solution to propose, but the situation strikes me as odd.
 
The best I can do is not use the word in an offensive manner. I can't control anyone else naturally. On the rare occassion that my students use it, I usually shoot them a look and clear my throat loudly, which usually ellicits a sheepish apology. They're getting better about it, at least around the farm. I rarely hear it from them anymore. What they do at home, out of ear shot of me and the Special Olympic athletes I coach, I have no idea and can't control. I can only hope I have some small influence on them.

They're good kids.
 
All cases like this do (and I mean any word, not just this one) is project whatever meaning you have for a word onto others. I don't give words power and don't want the power others give them projected onto me.

It has nothing to do with even using the word, just being told how any word should make anyone else feel.

That is all and of course it is only my opinion.


WORDS

SWORD

same letters, same damage.

You need to thank God you're not in the position to be on the receiving end of the ones that do the most damage.
 
I guess I dont understand the bitterness. This is a campaign about RESPECT its about treating people as people not as a condition they may have.

Its asking that you not call someone a "retard" or say that someone or something is "retarded". People are not defined by their diagnosis they are people.
 
What really irks me is this: the Special Olympics is a fabulous organization doing great work for special needs people, yet in this poor economy when dollars are scarce they waste their time demanding that people stop using words like retard and retarded. It is poor business sense. It is poor judgment. It is poor timing.

This thread would have benefited the Special Olympian athletes’ by simply saying: donate your money or time to the Special Olympics.
 
WORDS

SWORD

same letters, same damage.

You need to thank God you're not in the position to be on the receiving end of the ones that do the most damage.

That is just it, no word does damage, they are just words. Whether they are ethic slurs, racial slurs, words like retard or swear words, they are just words. It is action that hurts people, not speaking if you don't let it.

It's like getting all up in arms over being called fat, bald, short, or any other thing. If you get your self image from yourself, as you should, none of these things will effect you. I'm below average height but I am not going around asking for the word short or midget or anything else be banned. I am not interested in telling anyone what words they can and can't use.

I guess I dont understand the bitterness. This is a campaign about RESPECT its about treating people as people not as a condition they may have.

Its asking that you not call someone a "retard" or say that someone or something is "retarded". People are not defined by their diagnosis they are people.

I agree 100% but they also aren't defined by what they are called. I decide how I am defined regardless of what words someone else wants to call me. Full stop. It comes down to having enough self confidence to make that distinction.
 
What really irks me is this: the Special Olympics is a fabulous organization doing great work for special needs people, yet in this poor economy when dollars are scarce they waste their time demanding that people stop using words like retard and retarded. It is poor business sense. It is poor judgment. It is poor timing.

This thread would have benefited the Special Olympian athletes’ by simply saying: donate your money or time to the Special Olympics.

Done and done...but IMO the athletes DO benefit from the campaign, particularly in their everyday lives rather than just at practice time. Doesn't seem like a waste of time or money to me. Speaking from one on the front lines of fundraising and volunteering and "walking the walk".

But if you feel different, so be it. Perhaps you should voice your concern directly to SOI? PM me if you'd like the contact info.
 












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom