Nice to see you here babar, even though it's under these circumstances...just wanted to give you an alternate view, and keep in mind my position: moderate/liberal Republican, longtime MA resident, "security mom" (blech), etc.
Kerry is and will always be, to me, a second-rate politician, a very poor substitute for Sen. Paul Tsongas, falling into public service more as his birthright than a basic commitment to public welfare that even the Kennedys have. His record speaks more about his partisanship than anything else; he seems to have more ties to Europe than to the US, as well as, apparently, a predisposition for borderline subversive behavior. I was stunned that people considered him a serious candidate and it only got worse from there. Yet today, he held at 252 electoral votes for the Presidency, and thousands - millions - seemed to have pinned their hopes on him for a better future, and are mourning that fact today. Imagine my befuddlement.
I suppose I have a much different vantage point from a lot of other people...from there, I believe wholeheartedly that many of you - left and right - have lost your minds lately. It's that simple. Any moderate Democrat could have sent Bush back to Texas without the level of venom and divisiveness the DNC felt was necessary. And the moderate Republicans have the evangelicals to thank for keeping him in - the battles between the two from now until 2008 should be entertaining. Bush is too evangelical for the moderates and too moderate for the evangelicals...Republicans can fill two parties all by themselves. And they're in control. [Debbie Thornberry]Excuse me while I go get a container for my joy...[/Debbie]
I'm sorry, but it's all looked pretty to wacky to me for the past four years, and the country hasn't imploded yet. JMO.