Sony A350 DSLR

Check out this thread, that has lots of pics from other Sony Alpha users (including the A300/350). It will give you some inspiration for the types of photos taken, as well as some information on lenses and accessories being used and techniques:

http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=1508616

And of course, feel free to just ask any particular questions you may have in this thread, in that one, or in a new one. Anybody familiar with the A3xx series I'm sure would be willing to pop in and answer any questions that come up.

I use the A300, which is nearly a twin of the A350 - the controls, lens mounts, live view, tilt screen, menus, etc are all identical. So I'd be glad to answer any questions I can for you.
 
My BF bought me the Sony A350 as a Christmas gift.

Any users out there that have any helpful tips or tricks they'd like to share?


Congratulations on your new camera. I saw your reference to it on one of the singles threads, and wondered if you might pop in on the photo board.

I am a Pentax user so I can't give you any pointers about your new Sony.

I hope all is well.
 
Hi fellow Disers. I'm getting ready to purchase a new point and shoot, and am very interested in the Sony panoramic feature, and a good movie capability. I know next to nothing about photography, and I'm not sure if I really need the premium features of the more expensive Sonys. I've had a basic (paid about $100) Casio, and I have a Sony HD cam corder (which I would rather not take on vacation due to size if I can get good movies from a camera).

I've compared the specs between the three models in the thread title, and honestly, I don't really know how important each spec is. I'm willing to pay the extra money for the TX7, but I don't want to just buy the most expensive model without really knowing if I'm going to get an advantage for the money. Can anyone offer opinions of the three models, and suggest whether or not one is really that much better than the others, with the knowledge that the user is a very casual photographer?

I'll use the camera for family photos and movies, vacation photos and movies.

TIA
 
Of the three you mentioned, the TX7 has some distinct advantages that I would consider worth it over the other two...but I'd also say that there might be other models worth considering too that might be between the prices of those above. First off, the TX7 is a better build quality - the other two you mention are 'bargain' models of better editions. The TX7 includes not only panorama mode, but the very trick Handheld Twilight mode (very very useful for low light and night shooting handheld), HDR mode (fun), and Anti Motion Blur mode (when you absolutely need to freeze the action even if you get a little grainy). It has a nicer LCD screen too - top res...and the top-spec HD video mode.

Now that said, you might also consider the TX5 - it's a slimmer, cheaper relative of the TX7 - it has a more basic HD video, and a less high-res LCD screen, but it has the advantage of being waterproof, shockproof, and dustproof - you can even snorkel underwater with it. I personally find it the better buy between those two. And if you're looking at the H55, I'd say consider spending a bit more (closer to TX7 money) and get the HX5...this model is higher-spec than the H55, with the afformentioned HDR, HHT, and AMB modes like the TX7, as well as built-in GPS. And on the W350, I'd consider spending a bit more for the newly announced and just-hitting-the-shelves WX5, which should have better specifications including the HHT and HDR modes, as well as a faster F2.4 aperture lens for good low light ability.

Just a few to consider. I have good experience with Sony, so I wouldn't tell you to necessarily shop elsewhere - but I'd also encourage you to cross shop a few other brands too - there are some nifty cameras out there (not better or worse than the Sonys...just other good options!) - Panasonic & Canon make some decent competition, and even a few interesting cameras from Fuji and Samsung. But if you like the Sony selection or have a reason to stick with them, that's fine too - I'd suggest checking out the TX5 and HX5 specifically along with the TX7 and WX5.
 

I have had the HX5 for about a week now. The HD video is unbelievable. Looked great on the computer and just as good on a 42" TV. I took it to a local theme park to test it for WDW, and had mixed results with the pictures. Granted, I'm still learning to use it and I was trying to take pictures under some rather extreme conditions for a p&s. I am certain that it will do what I need it to do. Most of the pics that came out poorly were taken after 9 pm using various settings. Part of my comparisons are based on my DSLR performance, so this camera has a lot to live up to.
 
Thanks for the info and advice Zackiedawg. I've read some reviews on the TX5. Sounds like the only real con most people have is with the touch screen. Some are reporting that the touch screen is not real responsive. Any comments?
Good luck with your new HX5 BuzzLiteyear.
 
Re: the touchscreen - I will be very honest - I had no interest in one at all, and you could paint me as one of the fiercest anti-touchscreen crusaders there was. You'll find posts in the dpreview forums from last year stating as much when Sony came out with the TX series cams - I had a beloved T100 with buttons and pads instead of a touch screen, and was very disappointed that Sony was headed that direction with the T-series cameras that I loved. I did not actually plan to buy the TX1 I have now...I was happy with my T100, and would have kept it another year or two for sure. But I had a friend who had bought the TX1, and his girlfriend just had a general dislike of Sony for no real reason (as many people do) - so she wanted him to get something else. Being completely whipped, he obliged, and offered to unload his 2 month old TX1 for $100. Despite having no interest in a new camera, or the touch-screen controlled TX1, I couldn't pass up a $300 camera for $100, so I decided maybe I'd have some fun with the low light features...and just put up with the touch screen.

That's a true story. I still hated it when I first got the camera. Then I started using it. And my mind changed immediately. On an ultracompact camera, the touch screen just made sense, and offered some key control advantages over any other ultracompact camera I've ever seen. First, the touch screen sensitivity has not been any problem on mine - it responds quickly to all presses, even when made through a waterproof bag (TX1 isn't waterproof, so an aquapac is needed) or with a glove. The onscreen buttons are well laid out and easy to press accurately. I'm not sure if some folks get bad screens, or just aren't used to them, or have odd hands...but I can't say I've had any problems.

Here's where the real advantage comes in for me: The touch screen is customizable! You have 4 icons down the left side of the LCD for direct access to controls. By default, these are set up with mostly worthless things for me, like face-detection, smile shutter, steadyshot, and scene modes. At the top, the main Menu button is always fixed on the left. But the 4 icons down the left can all be user-set to whatever Menu controls you use most often. The main menu has all the camera's settings in it - focus mode, focus points, metering mode, metering area, white balance, ISO, scene modes, steadyshot, dynamic range optimization, etc. So as a 'photographer', having access to some of those more used features is nice - on almost all compact cameras, there are no direct buttons for most of those controls, so menu diving is needed, and multiple presses to make changes. With the touch screen, you essentially can render key controls as 'direct access buttons' with one-touch access. My main screen has ISO, focus area, White balance, and EV down the left side. One press of any of these, then an on-screen slider or selection to make the change.

Another very nice touch screen advantage - you have completely and infinitely variable spot focus control by touching anywhere on the screen to focus on that precise point. This is a wonderful little feature that gives a surprising amount of control over what is essentially a fully automatic camera. And when entering specialty modes like HHT, AMB, and HDR, most Sony cameras resort to multi-point focus with no way to override (HX1, HX5, WX1, and WX5, for example). When focusing in low light, it can make it very hard to find focus, whereas spot focus could pinpoint on a particular area and gain focus. The TX-series cameras' touch-focus mode remains active in all modes, so you can touch the screen and grab spot focus anywhere, anytime. Also in the specialty modes like HDR, many users of the HX5 have struggled to properly meter the shot (with HDR mode, the first exposure will always be for highlights and the second for shadow, but since the camera can only use wide area metering, you can't spot meter on a specific area to expose directly for the highlights). Half-pressing the shutter on the HX5 will lock focus AND exposure, so you can't focus in one place, then recompose to meter another. With the TX touch-spot focus, you can - tilt up to meter off of the sky or a light, while pressing spot focus at the very bottom of the screen to focus off of a tree or chair...half-press and you've locked focus and metering in two different spots.

Hope that helps a little. Not that the HX5 has anything wrong with it - it has much more zoom range and GPS and excellent reviews, so it may suit your needs much more than the TX series. But the TX series does have some nice advantages for those who want a little control over the exposures and shots, without having to go to a true manual controlled camera with a larger sensor (and the resultant larger body!). And even some folks like me, who couldn't possibly be more against the touch-screen concept, have been won over by the inherent logic and additional user-control and customization, it affords.
 
I'm really glad this thread came up...even though I got a new camera last year (my first Sony, a DSC-W290, not a great camera, but completely different from the Kodaks I've always used), I was looking really hard at the TX7. My only complaint with the W290 was the quality of the low light/night shots and I'm not proficient enough to use an SLR (or rich enough to buy one).

You guys have helped me make my decision, so thanks to the OP for the question and thanks for all the reviews!
 
I currently have a Tamron 18-200mm zoom lens that I love. But after DGD6's gymnastics meet yesterday I think I need something with more zoom power. The meet was held in her "home" gym so we were sitting pretty close and I wasn't real happy about the shots I could get. I know that there are lots of meets that we will be further away from the girls and I still want to be able to get good shots! I would love some input on a new lens! TIA
 
That's kind of a hard one. Usually when shooting indoors you want a fast lens (constant f 2.8) and anything longer than 200mm and fast will be fairly expensive. Do you have a budget in mind? Are you able to crop you photos? Often in sporting events I will do that if I'm further away from the action.
 
Agree with Kathy - a budget, and what willingness you have regarding lens size, would really be needed to make recommendations. Fast zooms are both pricey and large & heavy. Going the prime lens route will have the same problem in most cases. Sony makes a very nice 80-400 G lens, which is around $1500, and is F4-5.6, so even fully zoomed it will be a little more sensitive and faster than your 18-200. Move into the F2.8 lenses, and the price goes up!

One possible alternative is the newly announced Tamron 70-300 F4-5.6 - still not a super-fast lens, but reasonably compact for the range, a little faster than your current 18-200 with more range, and priced around $500 (note you'll see the older Tamron 70-300 around for $100-150...the new one is said to be significantly better, so make sure if you read reviews, or see prices that you're quoting the new model!!).
 
Can't help you with Sony -- I have Olympus -- but DD8 is also in gymnastics and here are some pictures I've taken that have come out ok. I'll post the settings so maybe that could help you with your own camera.

These are straight OOC. The first picture is taken with my 70-300mm.
Settings: 100mm, f4.1, 1/15sec, ISO 400

1063316076_EdLkr-L.jpg


This is with my 12-60mm lens. You can also see the type of lighting we have in our gym.
Settings: 60mm, f4.0, 1/50sec, ISO 1000

1063320767_8pKEh-L.jpg


Also with the 12-60.
Settings: 60mm, f4.0, 1/40sec, ISO 1000

1063343938_5y8dy-L.jpg


Of course at these shutter speeds there's a lot of motion blur, but I usually set my camera to burst mode and I'll have at least a few keepers. The only thing I think that will help with that is to get close and use a flash to be able to get a faster shutter speed. But we can't ever get close enough for that.

Maybe you can try different settings at her practices before her next meet. My DD has her first meet ever in less than two weeks!
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer

New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom