pgowder
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2001
- Messages
- 982
Assuming that the OP has the Minolta 28-135 F4-4.5 that lens is very highly regarded for sharpness, colors and contrast. If the copy is a good one reports are that it is very sharp - even wide open and is even capable of holding up to the resolution requirements of the 24mp A900. I was a bit sceptical of all the hype but I tried a copy and was very pleased with it although the general condition of the lens did not equate to the price the seller wanted so I passed on that copy. I'm not certain if the OP has the Minolta 28-70G or the 28-75 2.8 (I am not aware of a Minolta 24-70, only a Sony and if that's the lens never mind about IQ - little tops that!). I have the 28-75 which on my copy is best stopped down at least to F4 and that doesn't seem to be too unusual for either of the 2.8's I mentioned so though you can gain on the faster lens you lose out a bit on sharpness.
Maybe you should bring them all down OP and use different ones on different days.You have a nice collection to choose from!
Yes the 28-135 is very sharp! I love that lens. It is heavy though. Because of that I don't carry it too often. I need to shoot more with it though. I've had it for 20+ years!
On the 24-70, I have the D version that came out for the Minolta 7D. It is sharpest a couple of stops down from 2.8. But when I need the extra light, it's nice to have!
). I have the 28-75 which on my copy is best stopped down at least to F4 and that doesn't seem to be too unusual for either of the 2.8's I mentioned so though you can gain on the faster lens you lose out a bit on sharpness.
You have a nice collection to choose from!





