Tiggeroo said:No it shouldn't be a paid position. It would be sad to see colleges eliminate programs like swimming, running, tennis, etc because they don't draw in crowds. I do think they should be able to give an athlete a living stipend.
By the way my son just gave a verbal commitment with a D1 school for running. This is a sport that gets very little money thanks to title 9 and the bloated budgets for sports such as basketball and football. I could be resentful of those programs who can give their athletes full rides. However it is the income that these sports bring in that will enable my son to get a very good scholarship in his sport.
How does Title 9 effect your son's scholarship ability? You also have to remember, track and cross country are not revenue generating sports, infact, they lose money at 99.9% of all colleges every year. The "bloated" budgets for football and basketball subsidize your son's scholarship. Without these income generating sports, there would be no scholarships for these. Don't get me wrong, I love track and Cross Country-especially since we live in a town with one of the best Cross Contry teams in the nation- just pointing out that your DS should be thankful that he got anything because most don't.
Now, as for college athletes getting paid, they already do-they get athletic scholarships to pay for their schooling. Some get full ride scholarships and some don't, but they still get them and they are worth a LOT of money in the long run. There is a gal from our town playing D1 basketball, she has a full ride, 5 year scholarship. SHe is elligible to play basketball for 4 years, but they wanted her bad enough they gave her 5 years so she could take a light load. She will graduate in 4 years and is a 4.0 student. D3 players can't take scholarships for sports, so they are really the only "unpaid" athletes.