Seeeeriously?????

[DramaQueen]

I was just on perezhilton.com and i see this:

uhhmmm....are you kidding me??
homegirl is 15!!!

at least wait til your of age to be doing topless photoshoots like that!!!

I know you can't see her actual breasts or anything, but clearly se is naked, and clearly Disney needs to re-think their situation.
Usually I'm all for artistic nudity, and hey, I fully stood up for Vanessa Hudgens when her nude pics came out...but this is just over the line to me.

Miley's supposed to have this squeaky clean virginal Christian image, and uhmm...well semi-nude photos are really not a good way to promote that IMO.


Anyways, this is kind of random, but I'm just REALLY shocked right now.
So...Miley fans & Miley haters alike, what are your opinions??


(I'm Miley-neutral for the record, I don't particularily like her, nor do I dislike her)

 

[Sparx]

i'm 100% for artistic expression. (meaning I'm okay with artistic nudes and all that)
I stood up for VH when her cell pics came out.

But like you said, home girl is 15.

Artistic nudity should not involve children.

 

[reminisce]

i never liked her anyways. besides, this seems to be the way stars think they need to go to get ahead of the competition.

in this picture, her complexion looks like a dead fish..

 

[STOPxmickeytime]

The kid just keeps having picture scandal after picture scandal.
Honestly, I think she just wants out on Hannah Montana, and this is her way of showing Disney she's too old for it.

Anyway, it looks to me like she has a blanket wrapped around her, so Vanity Fair won't get in trouble, but seriously, fifteen years old?
That's going too far.

 

[Princess victoria]

Seeeee!
Another reason to hate her!
geeeezzzzzz
seriously!
what was she thinking?!!!
ugghh
and this is coming from the girl thats fan base is little girls like 12 and under !!

 

[PowerMonkey]

>_>....<_<....>_>.... most of you guys probably wont understand that haha.. but anywayy... yeaa... this is diff than the vanessa thing... vanessa thought her stuff would be private... but this is a public statement basically.. 15 is way too young for these type of shots... i really see her going the same way as lohan and spears.... disney sure knows how to pick their girls lol... ah well

 

[Tinkerbell424]

I agree.
Disney is promoting Miley a bit to much, IMO.
With the vanity fair half naked shoot, she's way to young for that!

 

[Disneylover 2]

>_>....<_<....>_>.... most of you guys probably wont understand that haha.. but anywayy... yeaa... this is diff than the vanessa thing... vanessa thought her stuff would be private... but this is a public statement basically.. 15 is way too young for these type of shots... i really see her going the same way as lohan and spears.... disney sure knows how to pick their girls lol... ah well

Exactly. I see her as a little Lohan if you ask me. What is Disney doing? Really...

 

[imabrat]

i'm 100% for artistic expression. (meaning I'm okay with artistic nudes and all that)
I stood up for VH when her cell pics came out.

But like you said, home girl is 15.

Artistic nudity should not involve children.

 

[Princess_Dot]

i'm 100% for artistic expression. (meaning I'm okay with artistic nudes and all that)
I stood up for VH when her cell pics came out.

But like you said, home girl is 15.

Artistic nudity should not involve children.

ewww I am a fan, but WHAT were her parents thinking allowing this! Gross

 

[KitKat_Tink]

oh my goodness...

This is not the kind of stuff that we need.

Miley is fricken 15...

People are ok with her doing stuff like that (well none of us seem to be) but if any other minor does it adults are in trouble for well it being illegal and all...

Miley shouldn't be able to pose semi-nude because she's a minor and theres pervs out there who will deffiently be a little to happy to see that...

 

[Cassidy]

Ugh.
Someone just murder her already.

 

[StitchfansJr]

 

[Babyjustrun]

Not only is she only fifteen, and nude in this photo.
It's not becoming of her.
Like, it's just not a good photo.

 

[Kairi-Angel]

When i see thinks like this, i keep wondering WHY, WHY would people ACTUALLY want to take pictures like this? If someone asked me to do that, i'd turn the offer down RIGHT away. I would KNOW it would effect my future, too. It just disgusts me what some stars are doing these days.

 

[Babyjustrun]

Well, the thing is, it's supposed to be a 'classy nude' photo.
But when you're shooting 15 year olds, it's not really classy.
It just screams pedofile.

 

[Sparx]

When i see thinks like this, i keep wondering WHY, WHY would people ACTUALLY want to take pictures like this? If someone asked me to do that, i'd turn the offer down RIGHT away. I would KNOW it would effect my future, too. It just disgusts me what some stars are doing these days.

Art is art.
but artistic nudity shouldn't involve children.

 

[Kairi-Angel]

but artistic nudity shouldn't involve children.

 

[DramaQueen]

Art is art.
but artistic nudity shouldn't involve children.

the vanity fair cover with keria knightley & scarlett johanson was absolutley Beeeautiful, and I didn't have a problem with that at all
a) because they are both in their 20s
b) they don't preach Christian values & being virginal and all that junk.

 

[chisnpeke]

Is that for real? OMG