Tis the season for school awards assemblies. At the middle school, parents only attend if they've received a call saying their child is receiving an award. In DS's three years at middle school, he never received an award - not even Student of the Month. (Of course, I, as his mother, thought he should have at least been Student of the Month once, as a kid with Asperger's Syndrome, making As and Bs in all pre-AP and GT classes.) He is child that will be overlooked his entire school career.
Last year, DD got 2 awards. This year, no call, so I guess no awards.
Don't get me wrong...except for Student of the Month, all the middle school awards are for the highest grade in each class, which is very admirable. Is it worth making 29 students feel bad or left out to recognize one student's achievements? Are any of those 29 other kids motivated to work harder next year so that they get the award? I just don't know. And of course, they give them for all classes, so the kids in the pre-AP classes are sitting there thinking that maybe they could have received an award if they had taken the "regular" class.
The choirs give awards at their concerts, that the students vote for (mst valuable, most inspirational, etc.) At the 6th grade level, they are pretty much popularity contests, but by 8th grade, they are pretty legit.
At the dance banquet, there were 6 awards given - again that the girls voted for - and the most popular girl received three of them!
I guess I just don't know about the whole idea of awards assemblies. I think our elementary school has it right. When the school opened, they told the principal (who was a seasoned old broad) that she had to have an annual awards assembly. She said no, she was having a success assembly. Each kid is called up and they get certificates for each thing they have done, but the big emphasis is placed on each student's "Personal Success" (learning the multiplication tables, etc.) It works nicely.
What do you think?
Last year, DD got 2 awards. This year, no call, so I guess no awards.
Don't get me wrong...except for Student of the Month, all the middle school awards are for the highest grade in each class, which is very admirable. Is it worth making 29 students feel bad or left out to recognize one student's achievements? Are any of those 29 other kids motivated to work harder next year so that they get the award? I just don't know. And of course, they give them for all classes, so the kids in the pre-AP classes are sitting there thinking that maybe they could have received an award if they had taken the "regular" class.
The choirs give awards at their concerts, that the students vote for (mst valuable, most inspirational, etc.) At the 6th grade level, they are pretty much popularity contests, but by 8th grade, they are pretty legit.
At the dance banquet, there were 6 awards given - again that the girls voted for - and the most popular girl received three of them!
I guess I just don't know about the whole idea of awards assemblies. I think our elementary school has it right. When the school opened, they told the principal (who was a seasoned old broad) that she had to have an annual awards assembly. She said no, she was having a success assembly. Each kid is called up and they get certificates for each thing they have done, but the big emphasis is placed on each student's "Personal Success" (learning the multiplication tables, etc.) It works nicely.
What do you think?