TexasErin
Loves old Pluto cartoons
- Joined
- Sep 8, 1999
- Messages
- 1,562
I understand Disney's desire to capitalize on Frozen's undeniable popularity, but I am firmly against making the Norway Pavilion in World Showcase its epicenter. There is absolutely zero correlation between the movie Frozen and the intended purpose of the World Showcase pavilion, sans the fact that the movie's scenery is based on Norway's countryside. That to me is not a sufficient enough reason for plunking it there. It is largely understood that Disney's interpretation of Cinderella (one of their most popular animated movies of all time) is based in France. Snow White... Germany. Mulan... China. Why stop at Norway... Let's just blow up World Showcase as we know it and turn it into New Fantasyland-2. Lord knows the MK version is rather unimpressive... maybe they'll get it right in EPCOT.(that's my effort at a little sarcasm)
I'm not sure what's so confusing about the ride? It takes you through time, from the days of the Vikings up to present-day Norway, much like Spaceship Earth takes you from our start as woolly-mammoth hunting Neanderthals to modern-day astronauts. Sure, the trolls aren't factual, but are definitely a part of Norwegian folklore. I won't argue the fact that the ride feels a little dated (OK, maybe that's an understatement).
World Showcase is not, nor has ever been the problem in EPCOT. Future World, on the other hand, is abysmal. The Imagination pavilion has about as much demand as an ejection seat on a helicopter. Universe of Energy / Wonders of Life pavilions are totally stagnant. The only two draws within all of Future World are TT and Soarin', and that, my friend, is the problem within EPCOT. Lack of investment, lack of Imagineering and lack of innovation in what is supposed to be the portion of the park focusing on technological innovation (how ironic) has led to this. World Showcase, on the other hand, was meant to focus on international culture. Explain to me again how converting Maelstrom into a Frozen ride fits this bill?
Much like us adults can get quite bored in say, New Fantasyland? The majority of MK is geared towards kids. World Showcase is the one area in all of Disney World's theme parks that really is geared towards adults. There has to be some balance, yes?
We can only hope that this is true, and I suppose I should reserve judgment until we see the finished product, but I just can't help overcome the notion that a Frozen ride just doesn't fit in World Showcase. As I previously mentioned, New Fantasyland I feel to be a snoozer, with the exception of SDMT. That would be the perfect place to put a Frozen attraction, and they could have had a blank slate to start with, rather than trying to fit a round peg into a square hole by working with whatever the Maelstrom platform can offer them.
AMEN!!
With the key word being highlighted in bold. I would argue that Hollywood Studios is in more dire straights than EPCOT, albeit by a thin margin. Lots and lots of rumors have been floating around, but nothing is in stone, and even if something regarding Starwars Land is ever announced, we'll be lucky to see anything by 2019...
Again, this is where I firmly disagree with you. Future World is completely under-utilized, and crowds mass in one of two locations: Test Track or Soarin', period. Every other pavilion - Imagination, Wonders of Life, Universe of Energy, Living Seas... have little to no demand by comparison. WS, on the other hand, has very evenly distributed demand by comparison. There is no one single country that constantly has a "blob" of people (aside from say, a hit band performing in Canada or UK, which are now going by the wayside... but that's for another thread).
I have absolutely nothing against the notion of Disney adding a Frozen attraction into their portfolio. I also would have no issue with Disney "refreshing" Maelstrom. However, I do have a major issue with the decision to scrap Maelstrom, use it's "guts" to churn out a "quick hit", and put something in its place that has 1/10th the relevance of the previous ride. Wouldn't you rather see them start with a blank slate and truly Imagineer something new and innovative? I imagine we're going to have the same exact boat ride, and rather than trolls and oil rigs, we're going to see icicles and snowmen. Again, I ask "How does this fit into the World Showcase theme?". The simple answer is "it doesn't". New Fantasyland would have been a much better selection for a new Frozen ride. Building something truly innovative in Future World would be where I would focus my efforts within EPCOT. And the aforementioned Starwars Land is what HS really needs. Your opinion may vary...
![]()
Will you marry me, lol??
To me, Maelstrom isn't dated-----I just consider it charming and Old World. I love everything about it....down to the 1982 Apple computers in the film (yes, I know those are very dated---but I can't help loving it).
And if I were queen of the world, FW would be brought back to it's former glory with Horizons and the original Figment/Dreamfinder Imagination ride. But I would keep Soarin' and Test Track!