SaveMichealEisner.com?

[YoHo]

Originally posted by DemoBri1
YoHo,

I was referring to the fact that Eisner did not develop a site to project his ideals like Roy and Stanley did. I brought up Eisner specific to this point and nothing else. Therefore, the comment regarding using our money to fly all around was irrelevant to developing a website.

But A website is merely 1 form of publicity. Within the context of what Micheal Eisner may ro may not be doing to defend himself and the funds he is using to do it, it's very relevent to this discussion. Sure, he didn't create a website. He did certainly use Disney funds to counter Roy's website.

It's very relevent.

 

[KNWVIKING]

***"He did certainly use Disney funds to counter Roy's website."**

But what ME did is what he is expected to do as CEO. If Roy is out there beating down the company, then the CEO needs to out there defending it. In a warped sense, ME is spending Disney money to defend Disney- and himself- because of Roy.

 

[Sarangel]

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by KNWVIKING
***"Personally, I'm surprised the moderator has not deleted this personal information."***

Why ?? The info is about as public as it can possibly be.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I didn't see it publicly listed on the website. Perhaps I missed it.
What's the relevance anyway to post it here anyway?

I haven't deleted this information because it is publically available, and I make it a policy not to arbitrarily delete information. No, it's not really relevent to the discussion, but our conversations commonly wander afield from (and occasionally back to) our topics.

Perhaps it's time to wrap this particular thread up...

Sarangel