Funny....
I just sent Competitor a request for a refund at San Antonio. These goobers have added a 'mini marathon' on top of the half and full since I paid my entry fee. This beginner runner 3 mile race starts with the marathons and is open to kids 7 and up. I have nothing against folks just starting out but the course courtesies in a 3 mile run are much different than the first 3 miles of a marathon. They should have started the mini after the other races started (or before). Frankly, I am fed up with the money grab. Elite Racing, the former owner of the RnR series was a runners organization. They had supplies on course and thought out how to fill the course with as many runners as the course would SAFELY hold. In recent years, Competitor has said screw you. We will take you money and then give you a bad race. Examples ?...
2009 RnR SA - the race start was changed and prior to mile 1 the race crossed a live rail road track. I was in corral 6 and had to wait about 2 minutes for a (you guessed it) a train to cross. I missed a PR by about the same amount of time.
2011 RnR Las Vegas - I saw this one coming with the course announcement. The full started well before the half. The courses combined about 4 miles from the end. With the later half start the back of the half race was at the merge point of the course as the front middle of the full was passing the merge point. Not a good set up with lots of bumping.
2012 SA - A 3 mile beginner oriented race will start in and among the full and half runners. The first 5 miles of the SA race are on old city streets and they are at times very narrow. I predict injuries to runners as real estate is at a premium.
Sorry for the venting, but frankly I do not run as many races as I once was able to run. All I want from a race is a well stocked course, room for all runners and a safe course. Ill let you know if Competitor even replies