Photo printer or get them done at Walgreens, etc?

I would look at the Epson Picture Mate. I have one and it does a wonderful job. The prints are waterproof and smudge proof. They also will last over 100 years so that is better than getting them developed at the store.

You buy a print pack for $29. It contains enough ink and paper for 100 prints. If you get to the end of your ink and you still have paper left Epson will buy back the paper at 29 cents a sheet.

It doesn't need to be hooked to your computer either.

The photos are beautiful and you didn't have to run out to the store to get them done.
At 29 cents a photo that is very reasonable.
 
safetymom said:
I would look at the Epson Picture Mate. I have one and it does a wonderful job. The prints are waterproof and smudge proof. They also will last over 100 years so that is better than getting them developed at the store.

You buy a print pack for $29. It contains enough ink and paper for 100 prints. If you get to the end of your ink and you still have paper left Epson will buy back the paper at 29 cents a sheet.

It doesn't need to be hooked to your computer either.

The photos are beautiful and you didn't have to run out to the store to get them done.
At 29 cents a photo that is very reasonable.

how much is the printer..??
 
Just looked on www.salescircular.com and found some other deals this week for the Picture Mate.

I took my Picture Mate on vacation with us when we went to DL. It was fun printing the photos every night in the room.
 

SandraM said:
My DH works with film, and recently as a test he printed some photos on his Canon photo printer and then had them professionally printed at a Fuji printing centre (we don't have Walgreens in Ireland ;) ).
There was no comparison as to quality - the professional printing was way superior!

would need to know the model of the Canon used, as well as the paper. Were these both digital photos printed? Because there is no comparison between film and digital prints. Film will ALWAYS be betters, all things being equal.
 
safetymom said:
The printer is $199. I just checked and Office Max has it this week for $179 and a free $40 gift check by mail.

A web site to learn more about the printer is www.mypicturemate.com

I had checked into those printers and they are definitely nice but I like the idea of being able to print larger size photos...

Epson has a printer right now for 99 bucks that will print up to 8x10's and will actually print right on printable cd's....

also for less than the price of the small epson, you can get an epson or HP photo printer that has a small screen for previewing your pictures and allows you to crop, etc..without a computer

I almost bought the epson but then really thought about how often I would actually want to take my printer out of my house..., the one or two times I would possibly do it I could take my Hp , it's not that bulky nor heavy..
 
dmadman43 said:
would need to know the model of the Canon used, as well as the paper. Were these both digital photos printed? Because there is no comparison between film and digital prints. Film will ALWAYS be betters, all things being equal.


I'm not so sure about that ....I've read a few articles recently stating that the newer digital cameras 8 megapixel and up, are quite capable of producing photos equal to 35mm..
 
MICKEY88 said:
I'm not so sure about that ....I've read a few articles recently stating that the newer digital cameras 8 megapixel and up, are quite capable of producing photos equal to 35mm..


# of Megapixels is only relevant as the size of your printed photo goes up. I.e. a picture taken with a 3MP camera printed at 4x6 and a picture taken with a 22MP camera printed at 4x6 will look the same. There is a simple formula for determining how big of a print you can make before you start losing sharpness:

Long print dimension in inches = 4 x (square root of megapixels)

For example, for a four megapixel camera the biggest print you can make without losing sharpness compared to film at normal viewing distances is is 6 x 8." From a sixteen MP camera likewise you could go 12 x 16." Of course you can print bigger, just you won't have the sharpness of film.

Depending what you are doing, digital cannot always replace film. If that were the case Arizona Highways would accept digital photos. They don't. See http://www.arizonahighways.com/page.cfm?name=Photo_Talk803

It's true that most photojournalism has gone completely digital. But, that's because it's fast, convenient, and the quality they need is close enough to film to not matter.

It takes about 25 megapixels to simulate 35mm film's practical resolution, which is still far more than any practical digital camera.

The key to resolution debates is to ask yourself how big you will ever need to print an image. If you are happy with small sizes digital cameras are great. If you want to be able to have prints of any size film provides that capability Printing amateur sizes, like most of us do, on a $700 EPSON will never show the resolution advantage of film, but it's there. For gallery type work, one will see the difference. The ordinary digital camera simply can't make enough real pixels for gallery sized pictures. Of course when most of us think of "film" we mean 35mm color print film, and make 4x6" prints. At that size almost any digital camera has plenty of resolution to give the same sharpness as film and you'll probably get better color from digital. But from a pure perspective, film has better resolution and image quality than digital.
 
BibbidiBobbidiBOO said:
mine go to CVS 1 hour and turn out GREAT. You can even upload at home, though I usually just burn to CD or give them my compactflash card.
Not sure how long the ones you do at home will last. They are fairly inexpensive at the store. About a 1/3rd of what you are looking at!
Try a couple of stores and see who you like! Even the CVS's around here can vary in quality!
I take mine to CVS also, and most of the time they even have coupons.......it is defineately cheaper for them to do it than for me to buy the paper and all the ink. And although I have a cd burner I still am not to sure of myself with it, I even burned a cd at CVS for $2.99. The photos are great and are usually done in less then 10 minutes.
 



New Posts










Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top