apostolic4life said:
No restaurant (even your local McDonald's) has the expectation they will ever have enough seating for every customer who comes through at a busy time. In a CS situation like we are discussing, the kitchen and cashiers can run a new order through every 3-5 minutes. The average family will take 25-30 minutes (minimum) to 45-50 minutes to get toppings, eat and clean up. If the theory the CM espoused was accurate, they would need a table for 6 - 9 families for every family already at a table. I am not sure there is a place big enough to build a restaurant with enough seating for everyone when the place is busy.
I'm not in the restaurant business, but I think you're mistaken on one mathematical point. A restaurant wouldn't need 6-9 tables for every family already at a table (unless it happened to be the first 5 minutes the place was open). Using your numbers, they would need 6-9 tables for every
cash register (excluding the one used for drive-through). And yea, just about every counter service restaurant in my area (and from my recollection, even those at Disney) has at least that many tables, other than those little window places intended primarily for take-away.
Even so, I agree that no CS restaurant likely expects to have a seat available immediately for every single customer as soon as they get their food, at their busiest times. That would be impractical. But it is a fact that when a member of a group occupies a table in a CS restaurant for the additional, say 5-30 minutes the rest of their party is in line, ordering and collecting their food, this is over and above the 25-50 minutes you mentioned. Thus, you'd need to add another 1-6 tables per cash register to handle all customers if everyone did it at busy times.
In any event, I think if there is any flawed logic here, it's that of using "there aren't enough tables anyway", as justification to occupy them for even longer. That makes no sense.
apostolic4life said:
As stated many times in this thread, everyone needs to be courtious. That goes both ways too: If you are holding a table, please eat and clean up as quickly as possible; If you are looking for a table and have food in your hand, don't automatically assume evryone else is rude just because they are sitting waiting for their food.
I don't necessarily think people intend to be rude when they're doing this. I know a lot of people don't even think about what they're doing. They've been walking around the park all day, are tired and want to sit down, so they grab a seat while dad gets the food. Keeping strollers or unruly kids out of lines is a good reason, too. The rude ones are the ones you see walking in, looking around, saying "wow, it's crowded -- quick, grab that table right there, it's the only one left. Or, using the McDonald's scenario, they see that there is only one table left near the playplace, scope out the line to see if there are kids in it, and decide accordingly to grab the table before the other family has the chance. And yes, I have witnessed and overheard the conversations, so I know some (not all) people do this for selfish reasons.
apostolic4life said:
We live in a very "me first" society. I think if everyone would think of others every once in a while, many of us would realize we are doing something "rude" to someone else too. It's all based on the perspective you are viewing it from.
I agree.

Which is why I like these kinds of threads. I have recognized myself in them on occasion, and have changed my behavior once I realized that it was bothersome to other people.