When I have a paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia episode, I would NOT want to rely on my memory, or that of my family member who may be helping me get the meds to decode the prescribed dose back to the
intended dose.
For any medical professional to allude or recommend this is irresponsible. How many financially strapped or older people would be enticed into using this technique to save money, but due to age, memory loss, or the stress of illness later have confusion over the correct dosage?
I have a very elderly grandfather. He doesn't see well and sometimes get confused. He is also quite miserly. If he heard this suggestion, you could be darn sure he would be asking his doctor about this at his next appointment. He
would not, however, be able to keep it clear on how much to take of what & when. It has to be clearly labeled! But he would certainly ask if he got wind of it.
This only works if you have a fixed or tiered copay anyway. Many drug co-pays are based on a percentage of the cost of the prescription, so no money would be saved.
I am flabbergasted that anyone would suggest this and I would
run fast from any doctor who condoned it. The prescription should agree with what is in the patient's chart. If samples are distributed, that should be noted in the chart.
I know dh would never prescribe this way - ever. He is a dentist, so he rarely prescribes anything but pain medications and antibiotics, but still.....never, never, never. It is not worth risking the patient or the practitioner's license.