LeCras
Mouseketeer<br><font color=red>I don't think I cou
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2003
- Messages
- 1,010
I have been lurking on this board since before we bought our first points in 2003, and one of the subjects that seems to always be on the front page is resort preference - which resort is better/worse, favourite/wouldn't want to stay there etc. Now, everyone has different reasons for preferring a certain resort to another. Good thing too!
However, one thing I have noticed is that a lot of people state park proximity as a reason for preferring certain resorts, e.g. "we love BWV because it's so close to Epcot/MGM", or "we'd never stay at OKW/SSR because it's too far from the parks". What I was wondering is, do the people who feel this way actually visit the park they are close to every day? The reason I am asking is, whenever DH and I go to WDW we visit all the parks. We spend one day at most of them, except for Epcot which usually gets two or perhaps three days (we just love the World Showcase hehe). For us, being close to one park wouldn't make a difference, as we would still be as far from the others if that makes any sense.
I am not trolling or trying to upset anyone, I would just genuinely like to know what other people's park habits are and how this plays a part in their preferences when it comes to resort. Now, DH and I have no children. We bought at SSR for several reasons. The financial incentive at the time was good, but we also really liked the proximity to DTD. For us, it means we have several excellent eating options a short walk away, as well as places to just go for a drink or catch a movie. We catch the bus to the parks wherever we want to go. We have been "home" once and absolutely loved it. Next time around we may stay in OKW, as we have invited my family along to celebrate my father's birthday and would need a GV and we haven't got enough points to stay in one of those at SSR.
Anyway, any feedback would be very welcome
Charlotte

However, one thing I have noticed is that a lot of people state park proximity as a reason for preferring certain resorts, e.g. "we love BWV because it's so close to Epcot/MGM", or "we'd never stay at OKW/SSR because it's too far from the parks". What I was wondering is, do the people who feel this way actually visit the park they are close to every day? The reason I am asking is, whenever DH and I go to WDW we visit all the parks. We spend one day at most of them, except for Epcot which usually gets two or perhaps three days (we just love the World Showcase hehe). For us, being close to one park wouldn't make a difference, as we would still be as far from the others if that makes any sense.
I am not trolling or trying to upset anyone, I would just genuinely like to know what other people's park habits are and how this plays a part in their preferences when it comes to resort. Now, DH and I have no children. We bought at SSR for several reasons. The financial incentive at the time was good, but we also really liked the proximity to DTD. For us, it means we have several excellent eating options a short walk away, as well as places to just go for a drink or catch a movie. We catch the bus to the parks wherever we want to go. We have been "home" once and absolutely loved it. Next time around we may stay in OKW, as we have invited my family along to celebrate my father's birthday and would need a GV and we haven't got enough points to stay in one of those at SSR.
Anyway, any feedback would be very welcome

Charlotte