- Joined
- Apr 16, 2006
- Messages
- 9,585
I call it Larry's Law of Infinitely Possible Exceptions.I'm really kind of baffled that you keep trying to find the straw man in this situation to make it acceptable. Kudos.
I call it Larry's Law of Infinitely Possible Exceptions.I'm really kind of baffled that you keep trying to find the straw man in this situation to make it acceptable. Kudos.
Just wow! Can't believe the thoughts/attitudes of some parents that action condone such outrageous behavior from their children, and feel no one observing this should think differently -
Your words - "hypocritical, judgmental, narrow-minded, self-righteous and assuming attitudes here sadder than the behavior of that child, by far." So, this is your take on parents that actually discipline their children and say so - quite a list of adjectives!! Children actually pick up on your attitudes, and therein is the problem - they 'know' they're 'special' and can do no wrong, and no one else should even 'think' they are! That's exactly what that waitress said to us the other night at Boma.![]()
Parenting choice? To let their kids be out of control, obnoxious, and clearly ruining other's enjoyment of the performance, bothering the performer, etc. etc. etc. That's ok because that's how they 'choose' to parent? A brat is a brat - look up the meaning. Why is it wrong to be truthful? Thankfully, most here do not seem to think the way you do, they try to be responsible for their off spring's actions and deal with it.
Just wow! Can't believe the thoughts/attitudes of some parents that action condone such outrageous behavior from their children, and feel no one observing this should think differently -
Your words - "hypocritical, judgmental, narrow-minded, self-righteous and assuming attitudes here sadder than the behavior of that child, by far." So, this is your take on parents that actually discipline their children and say so - quite a list of adjectives!! Children actually pick up on your attitudes, and therein is the problem - they 'know' they're 'special' and can do no wrong, and no one else should even 'think' they are! That's exactly what that waitress said to us the other night at Boma.
True, but 'not' doing anything about the situation at the time speaks louder than words. I've read before, that you do not have children, so you might would/would not be like these parents. It doesn't really matter to me 'what' discipline (most likely none) happens to the children 'after' the damage is being done if the parents 'choose' to do nothing at the time. Would a parent let a child run into the street, not do anything, then quietly tell the child 'later' (if nothing happened) that they shouldn't do that next time - 'OR' take immediate action to control the situation.
Oddly, "choice" is not a synonym for "appropriate". Let's work out the "choice" in greater detail...A meltdown is a loss of control. These parents in the OP's story chose to avoid a meltdown. And the kids were removed from the scene by other measures. I don't fault them. It was their parenting choice.
I try not to judge other parents because, for the most part, they are doing the best that they can. Children don't come with instruction manuals, and so many parents were not "parented" themselves growing up. Even if they have the best intentions, they make mistakes just as my wife and I did.And since no one including the OP knows every detail of the story , we should all refrain from judgement. Which was my point 12 pages ago. Does the OP (or anyone else) have the right to say that the kids annoyed them? Sure, but that's a personal issue. It doesn't justify criticizing the family, in my opinion.
The other day we were at MK, just enjoying the ambiance. Jim was at Coke Corner, looking spiffy as usual playing the white piano. He gave a lovely introduction to Maple Leaf Rag, standing up and giving some of it's history. Then he began playing. Along came 2 boys, about 6 and 7 years old. They went up to the piano, the older boy hanging over it looking and the younger one banging on the keys. Jim continued playing, giving it his best, while the young lad was pounding on the bass keys. Along came the parents and not once did they correct their child. They only suggested moving on to something different. Still the boy banged on the lower notes, and Jim valiantly played on. It was the worst rendition of Maple Leaf Rag you can imagine. The parents moved on, and little Johnny, noticing they were gone, finally left too. Jim finished with a flourish, and smiled. Of course he couldn't say anything about what had happened. I felt bad for him.
I never would allow a child of mine to behave in such a way. There was no correction, guidance or direction from the parents, let alone discipline. The children were allowed to do just whatever they felt like.
They were 5 and 7 year old kids who banged on a piano at Disneyworld, a place where they are often told to touch and interact with things, for maybe a minute. I don't think it was "outrageous" or "out of control" or being "brats"...it sounds annoying and improper. I would not let my kids do that, but I wouldn't necessarily drag them away and beat them while berating them and threatening that all future visits to the Magic Kingdom were cancelled. We don't know that the parents didn't get the kids to leave and then tell them not to do that. We just know that the kids touched something they should not have and then the parents got them to leave.
Kids who know better and are disciplined do impulsive things sometimes.
Infinitely better than letting the child run wild.After about 30 minutes at dinner DD was restless. We started to walk her around the restaurant. Looking back what was I thinking!
I agree with this 100%, and I'll bet that everyone who has posted on this thread does too. But the issue here is that the "parenting" takes place after the situation has been de-escalated. Some parents would scold. Some would teach. Some would spank. I think that this is where the differing "parenting styles" and "parenting choices" come into play. But what should be universal is that when the child is trespassing where he is not supposed to be, banging on a piano that he is not supposed to be touching, and ruining the performance for all the other guests, that is not a time for parenting styles or parenting choices. That is a time for intervention. And that is simply common sense. The styles and choices come immediately after that. Just as in the classic example of a child about to light a book of matches. We can all make different parenting choices on how to address the situation...after we grab the matches out of the child's hand and stop her from lighting a fire.I agree we should all cut each other a little slack, parenting is hard and every child needs to be parented differently.
I am shocked this thread is still going, but I'm going to be the odd man out here and tell my bad parenting story. DD is young so I expect more to come in the future.
I was once that 'bad' parent and I take full responsibility for it. My family had picked a place for dinner and even though I expressed the hour and a half car ride and then a fancy meal was to much for my 15 month old we went anyway. After about 30 minutes at dinner DD was restless. We started to walk her around the resturant. Looking back what was I thinking! Next time I'm just turning down the invitation. I didn't want to this time as it was my aunts 70th and my moms birthday (she had recently past), but I should have. I appologize if you were in that restaurant!
I have plenty of moments where I can highlight what I consider good parenting but we all should own up to our parenting mistakes and learn from them.
I agree we should all cut each other a little slack, parenting is hard and every child needs to be parented differently.
I know you're just joking, but I'm not sure advocating beating kids is funny under any circumstances.The parents should have taken the kids away from the piano, drug them right in front of Cinderella's Castle, and had Mickey and Minnie beat them in front of everyone. (All while Jim played along as the soundtrack)