one final lens ?

jann1033

<font color=darkcoral>Right now I'm an inch of nat
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
11,553
the 18-125 doesn't have macro (if i am right) my 100-300 has 1:4 macro, my sigma 28-80 has 1:2 macro ( which i need to upgradefor $10 plus shipping) so since i basically will only use the 28-80 for macro, is the 28-80 even worth the upgrade to use it just for macro..basically i'd use it for flowers or something since the zoom isn't really enough for anything much else but isn't the closer to 1:1 ratio better ( 1:2 vs 1:4)?
 
I think your decision is grounded more on footing that adresses whether you'll use the macro gains. If I'm correct this is just a $10 decision - so just get it. You may not know if you'll even use it but it seems there's no harm in having it? :confused3 Having a 1:2 seems better than being limited to a 1:4. No other factors condisered. :happytv:
 














Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top