charlespbg said:And TaxiMom, I apologize for not being able to include all the details of your story -- it was one of the most compelling I heard. Everything unfortunately has to get trimmed for space.
alohaguy said:It seems to me that there are two types of people who have complaints about Disney service:
2 - People who actually know from experience (many trips to WDW) what is realistic to expect and not expect. These are people who have traveled to WDW, and other destinations, often, and expect a reasonable level of service for the money they are spending on a hotel room. These are people who couldn't care less about towel animals (or at least realize them for what they are - a sporadic occurance) and are more interested in clean rooms, prompt bell services, correct reservations, correct billing, courteous front desk staff, etc., etc., etc. These are people who notice the basics of customer service and have the proper perspective to judge when service has slipped, or is below what they feel it should be. I think complaints from this group have risen - and I consider myself one of them.
The NYTimes article contained complaints that, I believe, fall solely into the second category. Basic service issues were raised, and I believe it is in these basic services that WDW has slipped. I keep returning despite the service, not because of it, and I wish that would change. I expect for billing errors (of which I've had two whoppers), reservation errors, housekeeping issues, less-than-friendly CM's ... but I wish it were different - and it used to be, in my opinion. What disappoints me most is that I can't honestly say that Disney leads the way in customer service anymore - five years ago, I think I still would have. My only hope is that it doesn't slip any further.
charlespbg said:It's interesting to read all these comments...
As I said on a previous message board, I indeed went to SSR to write a very short story on the resort. It was only so many things got botched -- including plenty of stuff I didn't have room to mention in the story -- that I began to see a larger pattern. And I connected the dots with what Roy Disney had been saying about service at the company. (If you haven't read "Disney War," it's an eye-opener.) I also knew about the Orlando Sentinel's piece that looked at maintenance issues at Magic Kingdom.
Honestly, I went in with no "agenda." As I stated in article, I'm a big Disney fan. But what I experienced at SSR (we also had a problem with a breakfast outside the resort) was so out-of-line with my previous Disney visits. (I live in South Florida and go to the parks quite frequently -- we usually have annual passes.) In fact, I'd say the service level at SSR was about the worst I encountered at ANY resort anywhere -- in two decades of travel.
And TaxiMom, I apologize for not being able to include all the details of your story -- it was one of the most compelling I heard. Everything unfortunately has to get trimmed for space.
WaltD4Me said:Very well said! I couldn't agree more!
Too many people take advantage of, or try to take advantage of that old adage. I'm sure there are many legitimate problems or complaints, but can you imagine how many aren't? We don't hear about those here nearly as much. People who demand a free room because they didn't the get extra towels they requested or people who insist on getting their admission price back because it rained?
Not only do people expect more, but they DEMAND more (and from what I've seen, not in a very nice way)
WaltD4Me said:You know, I also find it interesting that many people who I've heard complain that Disney is not "perfect" are also the same people who claim it is too expensive. .
AlanH said:Basically, my feeling is the highest levels of management (Eisner?) instituted policies to improve the bottom line for the short term without considering the long term. Since I have spent my career in human resources, I was able to share my concerns with management. Many of these people were sympathetic and aware of the problems. I would say that even people at the highest levels of management at WDW felt their hands were tied by Burbank. I hope that Bob Iger will be able to change direction at the highest levels and this will enable management at WDW to do what they know in their hearts is best for the long term success of WDW.
.
WaltD4Me said:You know, I also find it interesting that many people who I've heard complain that Disney is not "perfect" are also the same people who claim it is too expensive. That always makes me laugh. The people who want extremely happy, cheery CM's and plenty of them and immaculate, not a scrap of paper on the ground parks, also want it to be cheap to go there. .
WaltD4Me said:A one day, one park admission is $58 and a one day admission to Cedar Point is $48. In comparison, well,...there is no comparison! I'd pick Disney any day. I mean, believe me, if there is a sudden rainstorm at Cedar Point, you don't see workers immediately rushing out to squeegee the sidewalks and wipe down the benches and even the tops of garbage cans like I saw at Disney and if you want surly workers, go to Cedar Point..
WaltD4Me said:So even if a case can be made for some slipping at Disney, they are still SO far above the rest, it would take a major fall...just not a little slipping...for them to be in the same category with most amusement/theme parks.
freakylick said:I don't think anyone is comparing them to the rest of the industry. They are comparing Disney "now" to Disney "then". I think we all admit that Disney is better than the alternatives..it's just not what it used to be.
AlanH said:The role that hourly CM and first line managers play in the guest experience (for good or bad) at WDW can not be overstated.
I believe over the last 50 years our society has changed for the worse in the treatment of hourly workers. Sadly, Disney has been affected by these societal and economic changes.
This is also reflected in the Training. Traditions used to be a 5 day event. When my wife and I started it was 2 days. Now I understand it is one.
There also does not seem to be enough training and support for first line managers. The quality of first line managers is very uneven. Many first line managers just do not make hourly CMs feel valued or appreciated. This has a great effect on the morale of hourly CMs. On the other hand there are also many first line managers that are terrific; however, I would say most of these have been with Disney for a number of years.
Basically, my feeling is the highest levels of management (Eisner?) instituted policies to improve the bottom line for the short term without considering the long term. Since I have spent my career in human resources, I was able to share my concerns with management. Many of these people were sympathetic and aware of the problems. I would say that even people at the highest levels of management at WDW felt their hands were tied by Burbank. I hope that Bob Iger will be able to change direction at the highest levels and this will enable management at WDW to do what they know in their hearts is best for the long term success of WDW.
You know, I also find it interesting that when people make accusations that "these are the same people who...", they usually can't name who those "same people" are....usually because they are just assuming.
But that issue aside...maybe the people who claim it's too expensive do so because it costs a large portion of their disposable income to go to WDW. I suppose if I had a wad of cash just laying around to blow at Disney, I would be less concerned about what I am getting in return.
alohaguy said:It is, in some ways, Disney-past that WDW is in competition with.