What destination?I've only been on one NCL cruise, but just about everyone in all of the specialty restaurants that I visited was dressed casually. There were shorts a tank tops everywhere.
https://boards.cruisecritic.com/topic/3099554-elliott-investment-plans-for-ncl/I'm not seeing any threads on this on CC and no real outrage on reddit.
Yes I read that thread, but I don't see a lot of angst over the new no flip flop/shorts rule. It's more about Elliott investment. I don't know enough about that Elliott investment to have an opinion on it.https://boards.cruisecritic.com/topic/3099554-elliott-investment-plans-for-ncl/
Even Matt from RoyalCaribbeanBlog did a post about it, in part because RCG's former CEO is working with Elliott Investment.
A bunch of islands in the Caribbean.What destination?
I'm not sure you'll see yet enough outrage over the exact adjustment. However, you will or have a high chance of seeing changes in general. The concern is that the change is just one of many upcoming.Yes I read that thread, but I don't see a lot of angst over the new no flip flop/shorts rule. It's more about Elliott investment. I don't know enough about that Elliott investment to have an opinion on it.
Yup, with ashtrays built into the armrest.Being an old fart, I remember when people dressed in suits or dresses to fly.
Used to smoke, so I remember that too.Yup, with ashtrays built into the armrest.
3 NCL cruises here. Never encountered no dress code and certainly not what I consider their brand to be. Don't get me started on Freestyle dining .........what a CLUSTER that is.As someone going on their fourth NCL cruise soon, I'm all for it, but I can tell you that NCL guests are generally up in arms right now. NCL differentiated itself years ago from other cruise lines by having any time dining and no dress codes. So it's not really in line with their brand.
I'd be against this idea on the Disney Cruise Line because they don't have a dinner buffet option the way cruises with stricter dinner dress codes normally have for people that don't feel like dressing up.What does everyone think of this? I'm actually for this but I'm old school and think if your going out to dine at a nice place you should be at least in a collared shirt long pants.
https://www.aol.com/articles/popular-cruise-line-faces-backlash-011645464.html
The original thread on CC has been locked. https://boards.cruisecritic.com/topic/3098789-new-dress-code-pants-required-for-cagney’s-onda-palomar-and-haven/Yes I read that thread, but I don't see a lot of angst over the new no flip flop/shorts rule. It's more about Elliott investment. I don't know enough about that Elliott investment to have an opinion on it.
That makes sense. Not surprising customers freak out over every change on any cruise line including Disney. The freakout over not wearing flip flops/shorts for premium dining seems a little extreme. The change in management may be a bigger issue, but I haven't cruised NCL yet so I'm in no position to have any opinion on wether this is good or bad.The original thread on CC has been locked. https://boards.cruisecritic.com/topic/3098789-new-dress-code-pants-required-for-cagney’s-onda-palomar-and-haven/
The change is just for premium dining. No different than on Disney. You can still wear your shorts in the MDR....No judgement from me. I wear shorts in the MDR on Disney and on other cruise lines. Common sense tells me to put on some Capris or a casual dress when eating at a premium restaurant.I'd be against this idea on the Disney Cruise Line because they don't have a dinner buffet option the way cruises with stricter dinner dress codes normally have for people that don't feel like dressing up.