cobright
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 2,761
I had originally asked for some insight on the wisdom of my plan to take 2 Zooms with me to WDW an 28-80mm F3.5-5.6 and a 55-200mm f4-5.6.
My goal was to take a single lens into the park each day, using the longer zoom on the day we spend in Animal Kingdom.
Well now I've done it, I went ahead and got the Tamron 28-300mm all-in-one. I'm really quite happy with it across the full range. So now I can pack a second lens (according to my arbitrarily imposed rules).
Do I take the high-speed but manual focus 35mm prime (1.4F), or the 500mm catadioptric? My thought was to pack the 500mm JUST for the Safari adventure and various animal attractions in AK, then revert to the all-in-one for the rest of the vacation. It would also get some use shooting landscapes and such from some of the high altitude locations I'm planning on (observation deck of California Grill, that big helium balloon you can ride...)
The wide, fast lens is compact enough to let me tote it with me every day and swap lenses (something I don't really want to do but with a tiny lens it not so bad). But the only obvious advantage I would see with it is on dark rides and that's not such a big deal for me. For staged character meets I can blast a flash and the lighting is usually pretty good anyway.
Am I missing something obvious that would steer me towards the fast small prime? Or something that would steer me away from the monster telephoto?
I will admit that putting up the camera with the 500mm lens on is something of an ego boost. Am I compensating for something?... who cares right?
My goal was to take a single lens into the park each day, using the longer zoom on the day we spend in Animal Kingdom.
Well now I've done it, I went ahead and got the Tamron 28-300mm all-in-one. I'm really quite happy with it across the full range. So now I can pack a second lens (according to my arbitrarily imposed rules).
Do I take the high-speed but manual focus 35mm prime (1.4F), or the 500mm catadioptric? My thought was to pack the 500mm JUST for the Safari adventure and various animal attractions in AK, then revert to the all-in-one for the rest of the vacation. It would also get some use shooting landscapes and such from some of the high altitude locations I'm planning on (observation deck of California Grill, that big helium balloon you can ride...)
The wide, fast lens is compact enough to let me tote it with me every day and swap lenses (something I don't really want to do but with a tiny lens it not so bad). But the only obvious advantage I would see with it is on dark rides and that's not such a big deal for me. For staged character meets I can blast a flash and the lighting is usually pretty good anyway.
Am I missing something obvious that would steer me towards the fast small prime? Or something that would steer me away from the monster telephoto?
I will admit that putting up the camera with the 500mm lens on is something of an ego boost. Am I compensating for something?... who cares right?