When does the size of the MP really become un-important? If that makes any sence. I usually do not print any thing over your standard 4X6 pic. I might once in a while do a 5X7 for a collage frame, but that is preatty much it. I was wondering how low of a mega pixal I could go and still have a crisp shot. I also would like to have a camera that was quick between shots. Am I correct in assumig that the larger the MP the longer it takes to process the pics in the camera? Resulting in a slower camera speed. I am looking in to getting a new PS to replace our older kodak. The budget has put a cap on the price of $150, but she would like it to be even lower. I know to get truly "quick" shots you need to jump up to a DSLR but that is slightly over budget. I would also like somthing that was half way decent in low light. As my daughter does gymnastics and the awards sometimes are not the best lit areas. Would I be better off trying to find an slightly older PS that might be discounted with a 7-10mp but has more features. Than a new 12-14mp that is in my price range but is slow? Thanks for the help