jcb
always emerging from hibernation
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2007
- Messages
- 4,641
I've been good in not nitpicking at legal points as of late but I was flabbergasted by DCL's response to Kevin's call about how a DCL passenger can obtain large print materials (menus and the personal navigators) and extra lighting in a cabin.
I can only assume that, when they told Kevin, "we'll get back to you," they were saying, "oh, cr*p, we have to call our lawyers."
Not surprisingly, the applicable ADA regulations give, as examples of an accommodation, providing "large print materials" or "other effective methods of making visually delivered materials available to individuals with visual impairment" is one "auxiliary aid[] and service[]'' a "public accommodation" (a technical word for what most of us call a "business") must provide.
Cruise ships are a "public accommodation". That was settled in 2005.
Now a public accommodation doesn't necessarily have to provide the requested accommodation but what they provide has to be "effective" (unless the accommodation would fundamentally alter "the nature of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations being offered").
This last is why I'm not surprised that DCL wanted to know the identity of the person who needs the accommodation. To provide an "effective" accommodation, DCL will at some point need to know exactly what is needed and that usually requires some type of interaction with the passenger involved. It isn't, however, usually an accommodation to say that there is a companion along who can read or help the sight limited person.
But for a company usually so effective in accommodating individuals with disabilities their response was just plain bizarre.
I can only assume that, when they told Kevin, "we'll get back to you," they were saying, "oh, cr*p, we have to call our lawyers."
Not surprisingly, the applicable ADA regulations give, as examples of an accommodation, providing "large print materials" or "other effective methods of making visually delivered materials available to individuals with visual impairment" is one "auxiliary aid[] and service[]'' a "public accommodation" (a technical word for what most of us call a "business") must provide.
Cruise ships are a "public accommodation". That was settled in 2005.
Now a public accommodation doesn't necessarily have to provide the requested accommodation but what they provide has to be "effective" (unless the accommodation would fundamentally alter "the nature of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations being offered").
This last is why I'm not surprised that DCL wanted to know the identity of the person who needs the accommodation. To provide an "effective" accommodation, DCL will at some point need to know exactly what is needed and that usually requires some type of interaction with the passenger involved. It isn't, however, usually an accommodation to say that there is a companion along who can read or help the sight limited person.
But for a company usually so effective in accommodating individuals with disabilities their response was just plain bizarre.