It might also depend on who has the rights to reproduce the images as some companies won't reproduce professional images without permission of the vendor.
But as it's Kodak they'd probably be of decent quality. Besides, $4 isn't too much to spend to see how they turn out.
It might also depend on who has the rights to reproduce the images as some companies won't reproduce professional images without permission of the vendor.
But as it's Kodak they'd probably be of decent quality. Besides, $4 isn't too much to spend to see how they turn out.
I would definitely go with kodak to get an idea, then maybe take the CD/DVD to a more professional developing place to get your best quality prints.
As far as I know, when you purchase the high-res CD/DVD, you have purchased the ownership of the photos and you can print them where ever you want. (I wouldn't pay Disney twice either! )
What I meant was that some companies want to see a letter or note on the inside of the CD case stating that you do have permission to make copies. I know that we have had some troubles getting ours printed even though we have the rights to make copies of them.
What I meant was that some companies want to see a letter or note on the inside of the CD case stating that you do have permission to make copies. I know that we have had some troubles getting ours printed even though we have the rights to make copies of them.
I'm gonna ask Randy in advance for a signed letter of authorisation on his headed paper - I'd hate to get back here to the UK and not be able to get some copies / enlargements until he sent me a letter, as some companies are more cautious about copyright infringement than others.
Ritz does a beautiful job. A real determining factor of "print quality" is the finish. I recommend a matte finish print if you want that "fresh from the photography studio" sort of look to your prints. It really makes all the difference.