Perhaps, however, if it's something you must "vote for" I assumed politicalit's more legal than political. I don't remember pete even mentioning anything but it would be around injuries so it probably was something said during he seaworld lawsuit discussion.
You're going to have to elaborate further if you want to make your point because I'm not sure exactly what you're getting at?The SeaWorld Lawsuit rant. Bought a whale plush toy.
There's absolutely no room to complain about all of these stupid frivolous law suits, because you vote for them year in, year out.
You're going to have to elaborate further if you want to make your point because I'm not sure exactly what you're getting at?
Babes, I get it, that much was clear, but what exactly about that topic was being talked about because it seemed pretty cryptic to me.Jes, my dear, he's referring to the story from the show last week about the sea world lawsuit because of the stuffed animal thing.
Now let's all simmer down because I feel it getting unnecessarily hostile for the wrong reasons.
I'm glad it's a banned topic. There's a general stupidity around political conversations that happens. Especially places they don't belong like the dis.
i was thinking the same thing."because you vote for them year in, year out"
So since this is a legal conversation and appropriate for this board, can I address this comment?
#2....preach!Well, even though the very definition of politics is activities associated with the governance of a country, I'll respond since we were told it's fine.
1) "because you vote for them year in, year out"
Do you know who Pete votes for? I assume that's who the comment was directed at based on the title of the thread. Maybe the people he's voting for aren't being elected. Maybe other issues are more important to people (Pete or anyone really) and they vote based on those issues.
2) Tort reform is way more complicated than you're making it out to be. By trying to prevent "frivolous lawsuits" you're also preventing legitimate lawsuits. Tort reform inherently protects corporations over the individual. Here's one article I think summarizes the problem nicely: http://www.theatlantic.com/national...ti-democratic-and-ingeniously-marketed/35658/