Anyone know if Disney does follow-up surveys or uses any other measures to judge guest satisfaction?
WDW typically sends follow-up surveys to their guests after check-out. I know I have completed many of these surveys over the years and
always write follow-up letters praising and critiquing service received. Unfortunately, we didn't receive any survey this year after our stay at Polynesian in June. I found it curious at the time and more so given the number of complainants of late. Actually, there would have been nothing but praise this year--everything, including the weather, was spectacular during our visit.
I have been biting my tongue on this post, but the Bamboo H. I. comment finally drew me in (or suckered me, whichever you prefer).
All of the resorts have issues and if you're a long time visitor to the DIS (or other boards for that matter) you know that there isn't a one that has been unscathed at some time or another. Having been on the DIS since nearly its inception, I am a firm believer that complaints about resorts are cyclical. Almost no one ever complained about AKL, but in recent months I've seen some dissatisfaction voiced with service there. Ditto WL. GF has also been taking some nasty hits lately. In my view, it's just the Polynesian's turn.
I've stayed at a good many of the resorts, concierge and otherwise, (BC/YC, GF, AKL, BWI, CBR, POR, ASMu, and Polynesian). There has never been anything so negative at any of these resorts (Polynesian included) to warrant a complaint about my vacation being ruined--tainted yes, ruined--no. The vacation moments are up to me and mine and I'd never give CMs, resort atmosphere, even weather (and we've been through tropical storms and 10 day long rain storms over the years) power to decide what my experience will be--life is too short to give up that control.

Further, we have learned over the years that we won't tolerate poor service--there are always other options and issues need to be addressed as they arise NOT after the fact.
In this case, the damage is done and I do agree that a letter is in order and if the poster wasn't given a deduction in room rate for the downgrade, then--obviously, that should be addressed forthwith.
What I really fail to understand is the need by some to bash the resorts, in this case Polynesian, as if doing so will bring some degree of satisfaction? As far as the 50/50 CM comparison--I'd have to disagree--there are far more good here than bad. We've come to know many of the longterm CMs at Polynesian and, in return, are recognized by sight. These folks work very hard from bell services to mousekeeping. Admittedly, there are some rotten apples at Polynesian and we also know them by name and sight! We do our best to avoid these CMs. I've also seen the same rotten apples with different faces at ALL of the resorts and theme parks, not to mention other hotels outside of Florida. I choose to ignore them OR immediately point out the inadequacies if warranted. Most of the time I choose the former because, as I said, life is just too short to let a sour attitude ruin my day.
I make no excuses for any CM not performing to his/her best. Hurricanes or no, poor service is poor service and reflects badly on the entire resort--not just the individual. It grieves me when I hear such negativeness about our favorite resort, but I know it does happen--just know that it's not exclusive to this resort. If I had my way--all CMs would be as terrific as the vast majority at WDW, but since we are human--it just isn't possible.
To the OP--I hope you are able to achieve some level of satisfaction if you opt to write the folks at WDW and Polynesian. I am actually pretty shocked that you weren't offered an upgrade whether it be to concierge at Polynesian or LV elsewhere. It's been my experience that this resort comps people more often than not when they get a bum deal. I do feel badly that wasn't the case for you and your husband.