Statistical corrections happen all the time as better and more data comes in. If you can't wrap your head around it should you really be questioning the people that do this for a living that can wrap their heads around it. Tax collectors don't determine any of these figures. From the article you quoted.
Even if the total revision is as high as a million, monthly job gains would average around 158,000 — still a healthy pace
Or this part either
While other employment indicators (such as initial jobless claims falling to their lowest level in awhile) have since reassured that the job market is on solid footing,
No. They don't live in another world and they know statistics one heck of a lot better than most of us do.
No. It doesn't mean nobody can get a job. In fact lots of people have them and are getting them.
No. Businesses are not faking out the statistics. They're simply taking applications all the time whether or not they are hiring. BTW they've been doing the same since the 70s.
The data being revised is through March. That's 5 months ago.
.Timing the market is a game people that can't get their head wrapped around it lose.
View attachment 888024
If you're going to get scared and take money out and put it in and take it out, and put it in, that money shouldn't be there in the first place. If you're going to need a certain sum of money within 5 years, that money shouldn't be in the market no matter what you think it's going to do. The DJIA went down a thou a short time ago. It has already made that up and more.
And it's hard to know what the market will do tomorrow. It depends how it affects market estimates of whether the fed will lower interest rates. The short term expectations game is also one that shouldn't be played. That's a game even those that can wrap their heads around it lose all too often.
Show me exactly what national data you've collected and your collection method as well as your statistical analysis that contradicts the official numbers that you know better what's going on nationally. Otherwise, uh you really can't make such a claim.
BTW, what's being revised isn't what is used to calculate the unemployment rate. Hmmm. That's not a good sign for me going with your word on that one.