DC7800
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2001
Originally posted by dcedwards
they almost have to restrict access. If for some reason they did not do this and a guest who was just exploring got hurt the liability would be tremendous. On the other hand if you block access, post signs and do everything in your power to protect the public's safety...then responsibility shifts to the individual.
You're right, I wouldn't ever expect Disney would permit guests to casually stroll around the closed FQ buildings. Yes, that would be a lawsuit waiting to happen. If Disney is planning a refurbishment, it would be even more important to keep people out of a "construction site". Also, before this I was thinking the closure would be relatively short-term; elaborate fencing (viewblocks?) suggests something long-term.
What I was really thinking when I said that was blocking the Sassagoula River, closing down passage by both rental boats from Riverside and Downtown Disney water transportation. This seems unecessary merely to "secure" the FQ complex; there are other places on WDW waters where people can access closed-off or non-public areas (Discovery Island, for one) but the waterway remains "open". Actually, the most compelling reason I can think of to block the river is to hide the closed resort ("bad show") from passing boats.