Please take Marcie's comments with a grain of salt. She (He?) has a worse record then anyone that I know with facts vs. spin. I enjoy reading her stuff but often find myself wondering if she is a "plant" on the net to provide counter-spin to the web community. I bet she works in the marketing dept. and her job is to spin spin spin.
She is ALWAYS defending everything that Disney does right down to the smallest detail. If you read Al and Marci in the same day, then you will be able to maintain your balance. I doubt life is a bad as Al makes it out to be, but I just cannot buy into the "spoonful of sugar" either. One of her columns last year was three pages explaining how DCA had exceeded corporate expectations in attendance, guest surveys, and earnings. I chuckled for three days about that one. Then there was the multi-part piece about the wonderful nature of Paul Pressler, and on and on and on. Read the Mouse-info archives for fun some day.
And god forbid someone challenges her opinion on the message boards. Boy does does Marcie bite back. That's fun to read too.
It's entertainment only. Fun to read but little substance.
As someone who works for a large organization, I can still see huge "powerpoint presentation decks" behind every Disney decision. No changes. That isn't vision, it's entirely cost control. If it's a choice between two projects then cost vs. return is the ONLY deciding factor. I can just close my eyes and see the spread sheets.
As far as I can see, Disney is still operating in the "as little as possible mode". Until their earnings start moving, or there is a leadership change, little will change about the organization. I will still visit the theme parks, enjoy myself, and wait.
Because Car #3 still goes in that direction.