You're assuming the kids KNEW their shots had gone through a window.
How bad does it need to be? Were they shooting cans? Paper targets? They only need to miss by a fraction of an inch.
Or the kids brought their friends over who ALSO had BB guns. Granted, I doubt that's what happened, but it is possible.
She needs to be made whole, period. But the neighbor should have worked with the OP.
Continue on with your witch hunt!![]()
Assumption #1Wow.
So, your kids put holes in THREE of your neighbors windows and your kids never even apologize or take responsibility for their act of violence and you are mad at your neighbor because she couldn't make things easier for YOU.
Assumption #2The fact your kids are randomly shooting BB guns frightens me and astounds me.
Assumption #3.Don't blame your neighbor for the money you lost due to this "accident" or the fact she didn't bend over backwards to make YOUR life easier. Place the blame where it needs to go, YOUR kids. None of this would even be a problem if your kids would have acted responsibly (and if they are old enough to have BB guns, they should be old enough to accept the responsibility that goes along with having them).
I'm not taking anything too seriously. I have gotten quite a laugh out of the way so many have made so many assumptions about something they have no idea about and now its gone from bb holes in windows to "shooting windows out". I mean, I know this is the Dis but seriously??![]()
Wow.
Assumption #1
Assumption #2
Assumption #3.
I'm pretty sure luvsJack and I are on the same page here. We aren't defending the kids, we're not saying the OP shouldn't pay for the windows. Our point (and luvsJack will correct me if I'm wrong I hope) is there are too many assumptions from people, and then judgments following those assumptions.
Wow.
I'm pretty sure luvsJack and I are on the same page here. We aren't defending the kids, we're not saying the OP shouldn't pay for the windows. Our point (and luvsJack will correct me if I'm wrong I hope) is there are too many assumptions from people, and then judgments following those assumptions.
I'll disagree with you here. I think the OP believes since she's paying she should be allowed to get her own prices (which I disagree with). I don't think she thinks it's all so "inconsequential".I think peoples problem really hinges on the fact that the OP is kinda making light of the whole situation by calling it just an "accident." OP believes that it is all so inconsequential that she should be allowed to handle all the details rather then the neighbor.
I agree with you. Although according to msjprincess, they should ALWAYS hit what they're aiming at.As I see it, JUST ME IMHO, if the neighbors guns point at my house, that is unacceptable. BB's and bullets are EXPECTED to miss the targets sometimes. To ME, it's not an accident. Whether the target is missed by a 16th of an inch or 10 feet is immaterial. Missing a target with a bullet is NOT an unexpected outcome of target shooting.
My point of whether the kids knew they shot the windows was in response to the number of windows shot. Assuming this was 'accidental' (ie: the kids didn't mean to hit the windows), wouldn't they stop if they knew they hit the first window?If I were the neighbor, I wouldn't care if you called it an "accident", I wouldn't care whether or not your kids "KNEW" they shot my windows.
Oh gosh, this thread was my entertainment for the afternoon.
I feel truly bad for the OP that this happened and I'd be very upset with my boys if they did something like this, but guess what? I would NOT be obligated to come back to the DIS Board and post their ages, what I gave them for punishment, did I take away their guns? etc. etc.
LOL'ing at all of you that are demanding an explanation from the OP as to how she handled her children.
All she wanted to do was to rant about the way the neighbor handled the estimates and the bill. She did NOT come on here for punishment advice!!
Can you please show me what I assumed?So, YOUR assumptions are okay, but everyone else isn't. Interesting.
I'll disagree with you here. I think the OP believes since she's paying she should be allowed to get her own prices (which I disagree with). I don't think she thinks it's all so "inconsequential".
I agree with you. Although according to msjprincess, they should ALWAYS hit what they're aiming at.To me, it is an "accident". Otherwise it would be "intentional". That doesn't mean the kids made the best decisions, or should get off without punishment. I just don't think it was intentional, therefore it's an accident (I hope that makes sense).
My point of whether the kids knew they shot the windows was in response to the number of windows shot. Assuming this was 'accidental' (ie: the kids didn't mean to hit the windows), wouldn't they stop if they knew they hit the first window?
if they can't hit what they're aiming for and they shoot into another yard they should not be allowed to use it
I agree with you. Although according to msjprincess, they should ALWAYS hit what they're aiming at.To me, it is an "accident". Otherwise it would be "intentional". That doesn't mean the kids made the best decisions, or should get off without punishment. I just don't think it was intentional, therefore it's an accident (I hope that makes sense).
Once again I agree with you. That doesn't mean I can't find fault in what folks do.The DIS is known for making assumptions.
If one is going to frequent the DIS, some things just have to run off your back.
A few people have made assumptions and judgements on how the kids acted after the incident. I choose to just let those opinions turn into vapor and blow away.
My opinions on this thread just deal with what happened and how I view the facts as presented.
I'm bored.Just ignore the rest.
If I knew how far back the neighbor's house was, I'd be more likely to agree with you. There are neighborhoods where an 8yo can throw a ball from the back porch and hit someone's house. From what I did a quick read, a BB can travel up to 300 yards... 3 football fields.I don't think it was intentional, but I don't think it was in any way an accident either simply because it was an outcome that should have been expected.
If the kid had shot himself, that's an accident.
If the kid missed his target and the neighbors house is directly behind the target? Granted, it's not intentional, but since that outcome was highly LIKELY I wouldn't put it in the "accident" category.
OMG, I almost spit out my soda.Wow.
So, your kids put holes in THREE of your neighbors windows and your kids never even apologize or take responsibility for their act of violence and you are mad at your neighbor because she couldn't make things easier for YOU.
So, your neighbor take responsibility, agrees to pay for the repairs and you would still call the cops on them and take them to court? Gee, and we wonder why our courts are so backed up.All these strikes and guess what I would be doing as your neighbor? Calling the cops on your kids and taking you to small claims court for the damage.
Don't blame your neighbor for the money you lost due to this "accident" or the fact she didn't bend over backwards to make YOUR life easier. Place the blame where it needs to go, YOUR kids. None of this would even be a problem if your kids would have acted responsibly (and if they are old enough to have BB guns, they should be old enough to accept the responsibility that goes along with having them).