I flirted with Drizella and Anastasia * blushes *

[FlowersChild]

I don't want to know how and where, because I know it is photo shopped into his hand. Somehow, me saying that is mean and hurtful

It was not photo shopped into my hand. I really was holding that photo.

 

[fan_of_small_world]

I don't want to know how and where, because I know it is photo shopped into his hand. Somehow, me saying that is mean and hurtful

If I may answer this one, since I'm the one who commented on your post to begin with. *I* felt that your 95% comment, along with the "whatever..." comment, was unkind to those who had asked about how FC may have gotten a picture developed so quickly. It was a legitimate question, and as I said before I still can't see how it looks photoshopped. Not all of us on here are super-tech-savvy, and I thought you came across a bit harsh. And, like I said before, maybe you didn't mean to.

A completely separate issue are posts responding to FC in general. I see that you only have just joined us in December, so I'm guessing that you have not seen the drama that an FC thread can turn into. Most of the posters on this thread have been here a while and know the history, and I *think* that is what many of the PPs are referring to.

 

[CheshireVal]

BS - he answers to the people he wants to answer to in IM (which I told him to stop, because I dont have time for it) and in PM... he answers. But why does EVERYONE have to see him reply?? So you can rip those apart too? Must give them something to do.

Man - this is something else.

Well, the way I see it is he starts a new thread just about every day (nothing wrong with that-- lots of people do). But then he only answers people who give generic "You're awesome" types of responses. It seems like a weird way to interact on message board.

I thought the questions asked about his picture on this thread were legitimate. It wouldn't have taken much for him to explain it. If you or I or anyone else had posted that picture and we were asked about it, I don't think it would be a big deal. I know I personally would just answer.

I didn't see anyone here being mean.

 

[tigerdragon]

Well, I guess he replied. Everyone happy now? Good.

I like the photos and hope to see the characters in 10 days.

 

[SplshMtn99]

It appears FC prefers to talk AT people rather than TO people. All he had to do was answer the simple legimate question. BTW, I would still like to know from him what the answer is. I complemented the photos, but can't get an answer.

Instead, we have pages & pages of this crap again which only started after people said he was being picked on. As far as I'm concerned, only 1 poster picked on him with the Photoshop comment.

 

[FayeW]

It appears to me that Picture #2 is the same picture that he is holding in Picture #3. Although both were taken on the same day, it doesn't mean that they were taken at the SAME TIME! Perhaps he saw them earlier, took picture #2, and then printed it at a kiosk. Then he saw them a second time and wanted to show them Picture#2, which is how Picture #3 got taken. Just a guess.

 

[PrincessTiff]

All people want to know is where did he get his picture developed so fast (like instantly).

I don't want to know how and where, because I know it is photo shopped into his hand. Somehow, me saying that is mean and hurtful

I'd still like to know where he got the picture frame.

 

[Gurgi]

I'd still like to know where he got the picture frame.

You can get them at DTD.

 

[PrincessTiff]

At the World of Disney store?

 

[momrek06]

It appears to me that Picture #2 is the same picture that he is holding in Picture #3. Although both were taken on the same day, it doesn't mean that they were taken at the SAME TIME! Perhaps he saw them earlier, took picture #2, and then printed it at a kiosk. Then he saw them a second time and wanted to show them Picture#2, which is how Picture #3 got taken. Just a guess.

While that IS a good guess-timate, FayeW...why doesn't FC explain it. It is, as I have read this entire thread, interesting that FC is holding Picture #2 in Picture #3..... FC did say it was NOT photoshopped!

 

[oxfordcircus]

While that IS a good guess-timate, FayeW...why doesn't FC explain it. It is, as I have read this entire thread, interesting that FC is holding Picture #2 in Picture #3..... FC did say it was NOT photoshopped!

I am JEALOUS of your travels, Momrek.

 

[annegal]

It was not photo shopped into my hand. I really was holding that photo.

But still no explanation


Was it an instant photo?
Did you go to a Photp Kiosch and have it copied and then return , get back in line, to take more photos?

Why not answer the question asked?

 

[Blondie]

It appears to me that Picture #2 is the same picture that he is holding in Picture #3. Although both were taken on the same day, it doesn't mean that they were taken at the SAME TIME! Perhaps he saw them earlier, took picture #2, and then printed it at a kiosk. Then he saw them a second time and wanted to show them Picture#2, which is how Picture #3 got taken. Just a guess.

Where are these kiosks? I've never noticed them before.

 

[oxfordcircus]

Why not answer the question asked?

Because the thread would lose its reason to be. He's building anticipation.

 

[AuntieM03]

I wish I had the money to go as often as you!

 

[momrek06]

Where are these kiosks? I've never noticed them before.

Hmm..where exactly are these kiosks? Anybody? We were there in 2006 but I do not recall seeing any Photo Kiosks unless we just did not notice them!




btw: oxfordcircus, yes we do enjoy getting out of this state of MASS confusion!!

 

[Blondie]

Why would it be locked? People are calm. No name calling (well, my post WAS called stupid ) or mean spirited actions are going on. Why would it close because of a discussion?

Because most of his threads tend to get locked. Do a search (good luck there) and you'll see for yourself. They end up getting locked for one reason or another.

 

[annegal]

I wish I had the money to go as often as you!

You probably could, if you lived within driving distance of WDW and lived at home.

But honestly, wouldn't going to WDW every other week and dine at the same restaurant each time, eventually get tiring? Really?

For a period of several years we went often-every year, sometimes only 9 months apart, and it got old....even when a new ride appeared, the old ones seemed so stale. I haven't gone in a couple years, and will wait a few more , if I ever return...the cost keeps escalating for something that I've done lots of times.

 

[AuntieM03]

You probably could, if you lived within driving distance of WDW and lived at home.

But honestly, wouldn't going to WDW every other week and dine at the same restaurant each time, eventually get tiring? Really?

For a period of several years we went often-every year, sometimes only 9 months apart, and it got old....even when a new ride appeared, the old ones seemed so stale. I haven't gone in a couple years, and will wait a few more , if I ever return...the cost keeps escalating for something that I've done lots of times.

Well, I live 30 minutes from Disneyland and went every weekend in January so I'm not the best judge Doesn't FC live a couple hours away though? I can't imagine driving that so often, his mom must have the patience of a saint.

 

[PrincessTiff]

I wish I had the money to go as often as you!

Don't we all? Most of us have bills to pay, and in my case the added cost of tuition and textbooks. Must be nice though.