UKDEB
Moderator Emeritus
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2000
- Messages
- 11,840
By Steve Hymon | Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
Since taking office last summer, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has urged his employees to be creative and think outside the box.
Taking that advice to heart, the chief of the Los Angeles Animal Services Department paired with a Hooters restaurant in Hollywood for a bikini contest to raise money for city neutering and spaying programs.
But the howls of protests that greeted animal services chief Ed Boks' fundraising plan forced him to reconsider. On Tuesday afternoon, he canceled the city's role in the contest.
As word of the event spread through City Hall like a distemper epidemic, the reaction was swift and nearly unanimous: Boks was involved in a spectacularly bad idea. The department's role in the July 13 event raised the hackles of those who believe that the government's domain doesn't quite extend to judging the relative merits of swimsuit babes.
"Are we going backward? What is going on here?" asked City Controller Laura Chick, who said she called Boks on Tuesday morning to urge him to cancel.
Ranking high among complaints about the event was a poster displayed on the department's page of the city's website late last week. The dominant image was a bikini-clad woman, with considerably smaller photos of a dog and cat at the bottom of the poster.
By Monday after the first complaints that poster was replaced with a poster in which the buxom woman had been dropped; in her place was a forlorn dog wearing a "Hooters for Neuters" T-shirt.
In an interview Tuesday, hours before he dropped his plan, Boks said Hooters and other businesses came up with the idea of the bikini contest and approached his agency about being the beneficiary. He agreed because of his goal to reduce the number of animals euthanized in the city's six shelters.
"Animal Services has a five-year goal to end euthanasia. It is going to take an entire community to do that," Boks said. "We are merely the beneficiaries of this event; we are not sponsoring it. The long-term purpose of participating is to save lives of animals.
"Are some people going to be offended that we're working with Hooters?" he added. "Obviously, and I apologize for that. Hooters is a legitimate business it's not pornographic and they're helping us. I hope other businesses in the community will be inspired by them."
Not long afterward, Boks issued a news release, stating:
"I have reconsidered Animal Services' role as beneficiary" of the event "and have decided we will not be accepting any donations."
Hooters is an eatery whose logo is an owl but it is probably best known for outfitting its female wait staff in decolletage-baring tank tops and construction-orange short-shorts. The company's website boasts that all its waitresses are required to wear bras and pantyhose.
Since taking office last summer, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has urged his employees to be creative and think outside the box.
Taking that advice to heart, the chief of the Los Angeles Animal Services Department paired with a Hooters restaurant in Hollywood for a bikini contest to raise money for city neutering and spaying programs.
But the howls of protests that greeted animal services chief Ed Boks' fundraising plan forced him to reconsider. On Tuesday afternoon, he canceled the city's role in the contest.
As word of the event spread through City Hall like a distemper epidemic, the reaction was swift and nearly unanimous: Boks was involved in a spectacularly bad idea. The department's role in the July 13 event raised the hackles of those who believe that the government's domain doesn't quite extend to judging the relative merits of swimsuit babes.
"Are we going backward? What is going on here?" asked City Controller Laura Chick, who said she called Boks on Tuesday morning to urge him to cancel.
Ranking high among complaints about the event was a poster displayed on the department's page of the city's website late last week. The dominant image was a bikini-clad woman, with considerably smaller photos of a dog and cat at the bottom of the poster.
By Monday after the first complaints that poster was replaced with a poster in which the buxom woman had been dropped; in her place was a forlorn dog wearing a "Hooters for Neuters" T-shirt.
In an interview Tuesday, hours before he dropped his plan, Boks said Hooters and other businesses came up with the idea of the bikini contest and approached his agency about being the beneficiary. He agreed because of his goal to reduce the number of animals euthanized in the city's six shelters.
"Animal Services has a five-year goal to end euthanasia. It is going to take an entire community to do that," Boks said. "We are merely the beneficiaries of this event; we are not sponsoring it. The long-term purpose of participating is to save lives of animals.
"Are some people going to be offended that we're working with Hooters?" he added. "Obviously, and I apologize for that. Hooters is a legitimate business it's not pornographic and they're helping us. I hope other businesses in the community will be inspired by them."
Not long afterward, Boks issued a news release, stating:
"I have reconsidered Animal Services' role as beneficiary" of the event "and have decided we will not be accepting any donations."
Hooters is an eatery whose logo is an owl but it is probably best known for outfitting its female wait staff in decolletage-baring tank tops and construction-orange short-shorts. The company's website boasts that all its waitresses are required to wear bras and pantyhose.
.....there are a few I would imagine.
