dennis99ss
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2001
- Messages
- 1,476
You are going to Europe. You are traveling East, not west. Leaving at night arriving in the morning is an east flight. leaving a 6pm from Chicago is the late/mid-late flight to Europe. Arriving at 8am means you are stopping at a "first" European gateway. From Chicago, that is probably London. I think anything on the continent is going to be a later arrival than 8am, if you have a 6pm departure. Sounds like London though. From London, it is about a 2 hour flight into Athens, and Switzerland and about an hour flight into Paris. Make a circle from London to Athens, and you can get an idea of where you may be heading.
Australia, New Zealand, and the pacific are the other way, and, the flights loose between one and two days, depending on when you leave. They also will have to stop in either LA, San Fran or Hawaii. Not those locales.
There is one other possibility, and that is deep South America. Flights into Santiago, and other deep deep South American locales will take you that long to get there from Chicago, because you would likely have to change planes at a southern gateway, Houston, Dallas, Atlanta or Miami. Time is the same, and the flight is probably 12 hours or so from Chicago, but, with a change, you hit your time requirements. Once in South America, you could be going anywhere. Do you all ski?
My vote is London. But, I would keep the South America trip open. I trust that you would know which one they would pick for you and DF. What I do not get is the "driving" part, as I don't think you would want to drive in either locale, and in London you do not need a car.
Hope it helps.
Just some more thoughts. London just got a better vote, as the entry requirements do not require Visas and the like. I think Chile, and maybe Argentina do require Visas. (Been a long time since I have been to either, so don't count on my memory. State Department website can tell you though.)
Australia, New Zealand, and the pacific are the other way, and, the flights loose between one and two days, depending on when you leave. They also will have to stop in either LA, San Fran or Hawaii. Not those locales.
There is one other possibility, and that is deep South America. Flights into Santiago, and other deep deep South American locales will take you that long to get there from Chicago, because you would likely have to change planes at a southern gateway, Houston, Dallas, Atlanta or Miami. Time is the same, and the flight is probably 12 hours or so from Chicago, but, with a change, you hit your time requirements. Once in South America, you could be going anywhere. Do you all ski?
My vote is London. But, I would keep the South America trip open. I trust that you would know which one they would pick for you and DF. What I do not get is the "driving" part, as I don't think you would want to drive in either locale, and in London you do not need a car.
Hope it helps.
Just some more thoughts. London just got a better vote, as the entry requirements do not require Visas and the like. I think Chile, and maybe Argentina do require Visas. (Been a long time since I have been to either, so don't count on my memory. State Department website can tell you though.)


You have a lot to look forward to in the upcoming months. Enjoy!