joolz1910
<font color=green>I would have gone down to recept
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2008
- Messages
- 5,765
If so, how easy was it to prove you had been mis-sold? Our endowment matures in 14 years and we have been warned that we face a potential shortfall of about 40%!
I have the original paperwork and it does say that there is no guarantee but the forecasts on what it could pay out start at growth of 5% and go on to 10%, implying that 5% is the minimum to be expected.
I remember our independent financial advisor telling us about the risks in a 'I have to tell you this, but it is soooooo unlikely' speech. He made us believe that the risks were almost non-existent but he did say there were no guarantees.
It is our word against his, but I feel that we were persuaded (mislead) by someone we trusted.
Perhaps we were young, naive and stupid then, but it seems like a massive shortfall now.
I have the original paperwork and it does say that there is no guarantee but the forecasts on what it could pay out start at growth of 5% and go on to 10%, implying that 5% is the minimum to be expected.
I remember our independent financial advisor telling us about the risks in a 'I have to tell you this, but it is soooooo unlikely' speech. He made us believe that the risks were almost non-existent but he did say there were no guarantees.

Perhaps we were young, naive and stupid then, but it seems like a massive shortfall now.
