I find myself in the very very very strange position of taking the consumer's point-of-view in this case, something which many DIS members who know me know is relatively rare (since so often concerns posted online notably lack consideration of the seller's point-of-view).I still dont agree that its the sellers job to make sure the UPS or post office hands the package to the buyer...that is just me but unless you want to pay for personal hand delivery on items you are never going to be totally assured it will be handed to you
A sale is an agreement between the buyer and the seller. The seller agrees to provide a product and the buyer agrees to provide payment. It is therefore the sellers unequivocal responsibility to provide the product. In this case, the seller engaged an agent to factor and warehouse the product, and engaged an agent to deliver the product. These folks both were agents of the seller, not of the buyer, so the seller is completely responsible to the buyer for the non-performance of these agents. Without proof that the package(s) were delivered, the seller is liable.
There are two ways to avoid this situation:
- One is to force the buyer to arrange for their own delivery. In such cases, the seller's warehouse will have proof of the pick-up by the delivery service, a receipt that the seller can use to show that the product was delivered to what is now the buyer's agent, the delivery service.
- The other is to use the delivery service's delivery confirmation services. USPS even offers "Restricted Delivery" which ensures that the seller will have proof that a specific person (the buyer) took delivery, not some random person on the street.
However, this story is useful as a demonstration of what could happen when selling items through eBay: In the end, the buyer is not responsible for payment if there is no proof that the product reached the buyer, individually.
