lady danger
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2006
- Messages
- 152
I think it's unfair to compare Le Cellier to the Signature restaurants and expect it to be as good.
I don't quite understand why it's unfair. Perhaps a few years ago when there was a big difference in prices between the two restaurants, I might have agreed. But when the prices of their appetizers and desserts are about on par to what they are at (say) Citricos, and their Filet is only $1 cheaper, why should I expect the quality of the food and experience to be inferior? I know a lot of people look at these restaurants in terms of DDP credits, but there are plenty of us that pay out of pocket and my meal at Citricos in August '07 didn't cost me much more than my meal at Le Cellier during the same trip and that was before the big price increase of the filet. But my meal at Citricos was head and shoulders above my meal at Le Cellier, in terms of service, atmosphere and food. If I'm paying the same money to the same company, why should I accept that I'll get inconsistent quality between two different restaurants? To me, that seems unreasonable.
Now don't get me wrong, while I feel Le Cellier is way overhyped, I don't think it's a bad restaurant. I enjoyed my meal there, but I thought it about on par with what I could get at my local Outback. I like Outback, but I have no illusions that it's a high quality establishment. It's a place where I can get a decent stake for under $20. But Le Cellier serves about that quality of food with smaller portions, a 50% markup in price and served in a cramped setting. That kind of dampens any rave reviews I might have for this place. Would I eat there again? Possibly. The food is fairly good. Not amazing, but satisfying. But I'm in no hurry to go back. There are better restaurants out there, even within walking distance of this one.